Description
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).1) define Consequentialism, using your own words and the textbook.2) define non- Consequentialism, using your own words and the textbook. 3) Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?4) Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking. Must be able to respond to a peer
