Description
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:
What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Case Study: Fetal Abnormality
Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City. She and her husband Marco have been in
the United States for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of
their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own. They are both hard workers. Jessica
works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in
construction. Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant.
Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching
hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus. Further scans
are conducted, and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not
developed any arms and will not likely develop them. There is also a 25% chance that the fetus
may have Down syndrome.
Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and
Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances. Marco insists that Dr.
Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself
when she is emotionally ready for the news. While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another
room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face. She can tell that
something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of
the room wailing loudly and praying aloud.
Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation
to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus. He
furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step,
including abortion. Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to
Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband
that such a choice is not his to make. Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks
in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest. At that point, Dr.
Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis and lays out the option for abortion as
a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks
at him and struggles to hold back her tears.
Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence,
along with her conviction that all life is sacred. Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision
she makes but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled
child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans. Dr. Wilson lays out all of the
options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise
choice in this situation. Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and
allow what “God intends” to take place and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a
mother.
© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Collapse All
Case Study on Moral Status – Rubric
Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory
of Moral Status
60 points
Criteria Description
Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status
5. Excellent
60 points
Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of
moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep
understanding of the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation
is supported by topic study materials.
4. Good
51 points
Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of
moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and and explains the
relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic
study materials.
3. Satisfactory
45 points
Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of
moral status that it is compatible with is clear and explains the basic relationship to
intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study
materials.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
39 points
Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of
moral status that it is compatible with is unclear. Explanation is not clearly
supported by topic study materials.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Determination of Moral Status
40 points
Criteria Description
Determination of Moral Status
5. Excellent
40 points
The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status
of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale
for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study
examples.
4. Good
34 points
The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status
of the fetus is explained clearly and draws relevant conclusions. Rationale for
choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study
examples.
3. Satisfactory
30 points
The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status
of the fetus is explained and draws relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices
made is supported by topic study materials and case study examples.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
26 points
The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status
of the fetus is not clearly explained. Rationale for choices made is unclearly
supported by topic study materials or case study examples.
Recommendation for Action
40 points
Criteria Description
Recommendation for Action
5. Excellent
40 points
Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their
recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep
understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action.
Explanation is supported by topic study materials.
4. Good
34 points
Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their
recommendations for action is clear and demonstrates an understanding of the
theory. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.
3. Satisfactory
30 points
Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their
recommendations for action is clear. Explanation is supported by topic study
materials.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
26 points
Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their
recommendations for action is unclear. Explanation unclearly supported by topic
study materials.
Personal Response to Case Study
40 points
Criteria Description
Personal Response to Case Study
5. Excellent
40 points
Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how
that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant,
and insightful.
4. Good
34 points
Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how
that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear and
relevant.
3. Satisfactory
30 points
Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how
that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
26 points
Evaluation of which theory is preferable along with how that theory would influence
personal recommendations for action is lacking a personal connection.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evaluation of which theory is personally preferable along with how that theory
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
10 points
Criteria Description
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
5. Excellent
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10 points
4. Good
8.5 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
7.5 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
6.5 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Documentation of Sources
10 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
10 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
8.5 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
7.5 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
6.5 points
Total 200 points
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
