Description
The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for supporting evidence.
Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction and quality of life.
Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group on your intervention as a solution to the problem.
Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or group experience.
Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement your capstone project.
Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed this aspect of your project.
Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with the patient, family, or group.
Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in future practice.
Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to policy development.
Note specific observations related to the baccalaureate-prepared nurse’s role in policy implementation and development.
Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial predictions.
Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell short of your expectations.
Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a best practice.
Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this particular setting.
Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.
Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards.
Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in which you have taken particular satisfaction.Cite at least three scholarly or authoritative sources to support your assertions.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
10/14/23, 11:06 AM
Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection Scoring Guide
Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection Scoring Guide
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Assess the
contribution of an
intervention to
patient, family, or
group satisfaction
and quality of life.
Does not assess
the contribution of
an intervention to
patient, family, or
group satisfaction
and quality of life.
Attempts to assess
the contribution of
an intervention to
patient, family, or
group satisfaction
and quality of life
based on
unfounded
assumptions.
Assesses the
contribution of an
intervention to patient,
family, or group
satisfaction and quality
of life.
Assesses the contribution
of an intervention to
patient, family, or group
satisfaction and quality of
life. The assessment is
fair, unbiased, and
supported by feedback
from the patient, family, or
group.
Describe one’s use
of evidence and
peer-reviewed
literature to plan and
implement a
capstone project.
Does not describe
one’s planning and
implementation of a
capstone project.
Attempts to
describe one’s
planning and
implementation of a
capstone project.
Describes one’s use of
evidence and peerreviewed literature to
plan and implement a
capstone project.
Succinctly describes one’s
use of evidence and peerreviewed literature to plan
and implement a capstone
project. Project planning
and implementation clearly
reflect the influence of
evidence-based practice.
Assess the degree
to which one
successfully
leveraged health
care technology in a
capstone project to
improve outcomes
or communication
with a patient,
family, or group.
Does not describe
how one used
health care
technology in a
capstone project.
Attempts to
describe how one
used health care
technology in a
capstone project.
Assesses the degree
to which one
successfully leveraged
health care technology
in a capstone project
to improve outcomes
or communication with
a patient, family, or
group.
Presents an articulate
assessment of the degree
to which one successfully
leveraged health care
technology in a capstone
project to improve
outcomes or
communication with a
patient, family, or group.
Offers keen insight into
prospective improvements
in health care technology
use.
Explain how health
policy influenced the
planning and
implementation of
one’s capstone
project, as well as
any contributions
the project made to
policy development.
Does not describe
health policies that
influenced the
planning and
implementation of
one’s capstone
project and any
contributions the
project made to
policy development.
Attempts to
describe health
policies that
influenced the
planning and
implementation of
one’s capstone
project and any
contributions the
project made to
policy development.
Explains how health
policy influenced the
planning and
implementation of
one’s capstone
project, as well as any
contributions the
project made to policy
development.
Presents an articulate
assessment of how health
policy influenced the
planning and
implementation of one’s
capstone project, as well
as on any contributions the
project made to policy
development. Offers keen
insight into the
baccalaureate-prepared
nurse’s role in policy
implementation and
development.
Explain whether
Does not describe
Attempts to
Explain whether
Provides an articulate and
capstone project
capstone project
describe capstone
capstone project
perceptive explanation of
outcomes matched
outcomes and does project outcomes
outcomes matched
whether capstone project
one’s initial
not document the
and/or does not
one’s initial predictions outcomes matched one’s
predictions
completion of nine
document the
and documents the
initial predictions. Exhibits
and documents the
practicum hours in
completion of nine
practicum hours spent clear insight into the
practicum hours
Capella Academic
practicum hours in
with these individuals
generalizability and bestspent
with
these
Portal
Volunteer
Capella
Academic
or
group
in
the
Capella
practice potential of1/2the
https://a21371-1105796.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6938/files/21371~1105796/course files/Scoring Guides/a05_scoring_gui…
individuals or group Experience Form.
Portal Volunteer
Academic Portal
intervention. Documents
10/14/23, 11:06 AM
CRITERIA
Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection Scoring Guide
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
Volunteer
Experience Form.
Document the
completion of nine
hours of practicum
time.
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
completion of nine
hours of practicum
time.
individuals or group in the
Capella Academic Portal
Volunteer Experience
Form. Documents the
completion of nine hours
of practicum time.
Assess one’s
personal and
professional growth
throughout a
capstone project
and the RN-to-BSN
program.
Does not
summarize one’s
personal and
professional growth
throughout a
capstone project
and the RN-to-BSN
program.
Summarizes one’s
personal and
professional growth
throughout a
capstone project
and the RN-to-BSN
program.
Assesses one’s
personal and
professional growth
throughout a capstone
project and the RN-toBSN program.
Objectively assesses
one’s personal and
professional growth
throughout a capstone
project and the RN-to-BSN
program. Provides a
comprehensive and
detailed retrospective of
one’s overall performance
and growth.
Communicate
professionally in a
clear and wellorganized video.
Does not
communicate in a
video.
Communicates in a
video. Content
delivery is hesitant,
unclear, or read
from a script.
Communicates
professionally in a
clear and wellorganized video.
Communicates
professionally in a clear
and well-organized video.
Content delivery is
focused, smooth, and wellrehearsed. Information
sources are credited
appropriately.
https://a21371-1105796.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6938/files/21371~1105796/course files/Scoring Guides/a05_scoring_gui…
2/2
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
