Description
This week you are to develop a PowerPoint presentation summarizing your Public Health Analysis paper. The presentation should analyze the public health issue in terms of the justice, legal, regulatory, data and advanced practice issues related to it. Be sure to identify how your discussion relates to the objectives of Healthy People 2020.What strategies or policies have been used to address the issue?Are they working? Why or why not?What strategies do you propose to improve the situation? Is legislative change needed?What are the implications of this issue for advanced practice nursing and/or public health? In other words where do we go with this policy issue in the future?Your PowerPoint presentation should be 20-25 slides, in APA format, with details included. Be creative.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1
Comprehensive Review of the Literature: Enhancing Vaccination Rates through
Advanced Practice Nursing Interventions
Sabina Thomas, MSN, APRN, FNP-C
South University
NSG 7005
Dr. Alejandro
9/18/2023
2
Comprehensive Review of the Literature: Enhancing Vaccination Rates through
Advanced Practice Nursing Interventions
In order to develop a robust evidence-based Public Health Analysis Paper on
enhancing vaccination rates through advanced practice nursing (APN) interventions, it is
essential to conduct a comprehensive review of the existing literature. This literature review
will serve as the foundation for understanding the current state of vaccination rates, the role
of APNs, and the effectiveness of APN interventions in addressing this critical public health
issue. Additionally, this review endeavors to extend our understanding by delving into
primary sources that offer valuable insights into the challenging task of bolstering vaccination
rates through public policy interventions. Primary sources, including research studies, clinical
trials, government reports, and authoritative documents, serve as the bedrock for shaping
sound vaccination policies and are thus instrumental in this exploration.
Current State of Vaccination Rates
It is imperative to understand the current state of vaccination rates in the United
States. The literature suggests that despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines,
vaccination rates for certain diseases have fallen below the desired thresholds, leading to
outbreaks and public health concerns (Orestein & Ahmed, 2017). Studies and reports from
organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provide valuable
statistics and trends related to vaccination coverage across various age groups and vaccines
(CDC, 2020).
The Role of Advanced Practice Nurses in Vaccination
Advanced practice nurses play a crucial role in healthcare delivery and preventive
care. They are often at the forefront of primary care and are well-positioned to address
vaccination-related issues (American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2022). Several
studies highlight the importance of APNs in vaccination advocacy, education, and
3
administration. These professionals are not only skilled in providing vaccinations but also in
counseling patients and families about vaccine safety and efficacy (Limaye et al., 2021).
Research indicates that patients are more likely to accept vaccines when recommended by
their APN, underscoring the influential role APNs can play in improving vaccination rates
(Siddiqui et al., 2022).
Effectiveness of APN Interventions
The effectiveness of APN interventions in enhancing vaccination rates is a critical
aspect of this literature review. Research studies evaluating the impact of APN-led initiatives
on vaccination rates provide valuable insights. These interventions may include communitybased immunization clinics, educational campaigns, and collaborations with schools and local
health departments. It is crucial to explore the strategies employed by APNs to address
vaccine hesitancy and improve vaccine acceptance among diverse populations. Tailoring
interventions to specific communities, taking into account cultural and socioeconomic
factors, has been shown to be effective in increasing vaccination rates (Rodrigues & Plotkin,
2020). Examining successful case studies and evidence-based practices can provide valuable
guidance for APNs seeking to implement interventions in their practice settings (Ismail et al.,
2022; NICE, 2022).
Alignment with Healthy People 2020 Objectives
An integral part of this literature review involves assessing how the proposed APN
interventions align with the objectives of Healthy People 2020, specifically those related to
immunization and infectious diseases (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,
2021). Healthy People 2020 aims to increase vaccination rates, reduce vaccine-preventable
diseases, and eliminate health disparities in immunization coverage (CDC, 2020). The
literature should be scrutinized to identify examples where APN-led interventions have
contributed to achieving these objectives. Research demonstrating the impact of such
4
interventions on improving vaccination rates at the population level can underscore their
significance in public health efforts.
Relating Data to the Capstone Project
The integration of findings from the literature review into the capstone project, which
focuses on community health promotion, is a critical step in ensuring that evidence-based
strategies are applied effectively. The literature review will identify specific best practices
and interventions that can directly inform the design and implementation of the capstone
project. For example, if the review highlights that community-based vaccination clinics led
by advanced practice nurses (APNs) have significantly increased vaccination rates, these
clinics can be used as a model for the capstone project. The capstone project could involve
establishing similar clinics within the targeted community to provide convenient access to
vaccinations. Furthermore, the literature review will guide the selection of vaccines to
prioritize based on the unique needs of the community. For instance, if the review reveals that
a specific vaccine-preventable disease is more prevalent in the community, the capstone
project can focus on increasing vaccination coverage for that particular disease.
Primary Sources on Vaccination Policies
Clinical Trials and Vaccine Efficacy Studies
Primary research studies and clinical trials assume a pivotal role in assessing the
safety and efficacy of vaccines. These meticulously conducted experiments, often
orchestrated by esteemed entities like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and
pharmaceutical firms, provide fundamental data pertaining to vaccine development, testing
processes, and outcomes. The information gleaned from these primary sources is
indispensable in the formulation of vaccination policies. It offers concrete evidence of a
vaccine’s effectiveness and safety, contributing to informed decision-making in public health
(Langford, 2020; Robinson et al., 2022).
5
In these trials, the effectiveness and safety of vaccines are laid bare, subjected to
intense scrutiny, and evaluated with exacting precision. The data derived from these primary
sources constitute a treasure trove of evidence that forms the bedrock upon which vaccination
policies are constructed. They furnish policymakers with concrete and unassailable proof of a
vaccine’s performance. Such empirical grounding is paramount in guiding the direction of
public health strategies, ensuring that decisions are based on scientific certainties rather than
conjecture or speculation.
As individuals navigate the complex landscape of vaccination policies, these primary
sources offer an unimpeachable foundation upon which their understanding is built. They
empower policymakers with the confidence to make decisions that directly impact the health
and well-being of communities, grounded in the evidence painstakingly gathered in these
trials. The value of clinical trials and vaccine efficacy studies cannot be overstated; they are
the vanguards of public health, forging a path towards safer and more effective vaccination
practices.
Government Reports and Surveillance Data
Government agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), assume an unwavering role as steadfast
sources of primary reports and surveillance data. These publications represent a
comprehensive repository of meticulously collected and curated data concerning vaccination
rates, the prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases, and the monitoring of adverse events
following vaccination. As guardians of public health, these agencies offer an exhaustive
panorama of the complex and ever-evolving public health landscape.
Within the pages of these reports lie invaluable insights into the impact of vaccination
policies. They provide policymakers and researchers with a data-rich canvas on which to
paint a vivid picture of vaccination efficacy and its broader consequences. The ability to
6
monitor disease outbreaks, gauge vaccination campaign efficacy, and assess the safety and
effectiveness of vaccines is crucial for evidence-based policy formulation. In essence, these
primary sources, emanating from the authoritative agencies like the CDC and WHO, are the
keystones that support the arch of informed decision-making in public health (CDC, 2022;
WHO, 2023).
As individuals delve into the labyrinthine world of vaccination policies, these
government reports and surveillance data serve as a guiding light. They offer an unparalleled
vantage point from which to navigate the intricacies of public health initiatives. Armed with
the insights garnered from these sources, policymakers and researchers are better equipped to
design and implement vaccination strategies that safeguard public well-being. In an era where
data-driven decisions are paramount, these primary sources serve as the bedrock upon which
the foundations of effective vaccination policies are built.
Policy Evaluations and Impact Assessments
Policy evaluations and impact assessments, often conducted by universities, research
institutions, and government entities, stand as pivotal endeavors in critically scrutinizing the
effectiveness of vaccination policies. These primary research undertakings delve deep into
the ramifications of policy alterations on crucial aspects such as vaccination rates, the
prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases, and the economic dimensions of healthcare. They
provide policymakers with a granular understanding of the tangible impacts of policies,
arming them with the essential information required to iteratively craft and refine vaccination
strategies.
By meticulously examining the consequences of policy changes, these primary
sources become the crucible in which the efficacy of vaccination policies is tested and
refined. Through rigorous research methodologies, they unearth invaluable insights into the
real-world outcomes of policy shifts, offering a comprehensive view of their influence on
7
public health outcomes. Policymakers can draw upon the evidence generated by these
assessments to make informed decisions, adapt policies as necessary, and continually
enhance vaccination strategies to address evolving challenges (Rodrigues & Plotkin, 2020).
In the complex landscape of vaccination policy, policy evaluations and impact
assessments serve as beacons of evidence, guiding the formulation of strategies that have a
meaningful impact on public health. They bridge the gap between theory and practice,
ensuring that policy changes translate into tangible benefits for communities. As such, they
are instrumental in the iterative process of crafting effective vaccination policies that
safeguard public well-being.
Vaccine Hesitancy and Communication Research
In the quest to understand the complexities surrounding vaccine acceptance, primary
research on vaccine hesitancy and communication strategies offers profound insights. These
investigations dissect public perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs regarding vaccines,
illuminating the socio-psychological underpinnings of vaccine hesitancy. Furthermore,
primary sources delve into the efficacy of diverse communication interventions, providing
data-backed strategies for crafting effective communication policies. Such research is pivotal
in aligning vaccination policies with the multifaceted dynamics of public opinion (de
Figueiredo et al., 2020; Nuwarda et al., 2022).
Health Equity and Access Research
The pursuit of health equity and equitable access to vaccines demands rigorous
research. Primary sources scrutinizing barriers to access, socioeconomic determinants, and
strategies for bridging healthcare disparities in vaccination rates are essential. These sources
shed light on the uneven distribution of vaccines, the role of socioeconomic factors, and
interventions required to ensure equitable vaccine distribution. They are a moral compass that
8
directs policy initiatives towards addressing disparities and ensuring that no community is left
behind in vaccination efforts (Ali et al., 2022).
Methodologies in Primary Studies
Understanding the methodologies employed in primary studies is imperative for
critically evaluating their findings and relevance to public policy analysis. Primary research
in the field of vaccines embraces a diverse set of methodologies, each tailored to specific
objectives:
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
Randomized controlled trials stand as the gold standard for assessing vaccine safety
and efficacy. These meticulously designed experiments randomly assign participants to
receive either the vaccine or a placebo, ensuring rigorous evaluation of vaccine outcomes.
RCTs furnish policymakers with unequivocal data on vaccine performance, serving as the
foundation for vaccine licensure and policy recommendations (Smith et al., 2008).
Surveillance and Epidemiological Studies
Epidemiological studies cast a wide net over disease occurrence and distribution.
These primary investigations, often leveraging extensive datasets and robust statistical
analyses, unearth trends, unearth risk factors, and gauge the effectiveness of vaccination
programs. Such studies are invaluable in identifying the real-world impact of vaccination
policies on populations (Hansen et al., 2019).
Qualitative Research
Qualitative research methods, encompassing interviews and focus groups, provide a
nuanced understanding of the motivations, attitudes, and beliefs that underpin vaccination
behavior. By delving into the human aspect of vaccine acceptance and hesitancy, qualitative
studies contribute rich, context-dependent data that enrich policy decisions. They bridge the
gap between raw data and actionable insights (Erchick et al., 2022).
9
Policy Analysis
The domain of policy analysis research entails a holistic appraisal of vaccination
policies. Researchers in this arena delve into policy documents, engage in stakeholder
interviews, and scrutinize policy implementation. By dissecting the lifecycle of vaccination
policies, from conception to execution, policy analysis research illuminates the nuances of
policy formulation and the impacts of policy changes (Attwell & Navin, 2019; Rodrigues &
Plotkin, 2020).
Conclusion
This comprehensive review of the literature is essential for building a strong
evidence-based foundation for the Public Health Analysis Paper. It will provide a thorough
understanding of the current state of vaccination rates, the role of APNs, the effectiveness of
APN interventions, alignment with Healthy People 2020 objectives, and practical insights for
application in the capstone project. By synthesizing and critically analyzing existing research,
this literature review will contribute to the development of a well-informed and impactful
analysis of the public health issue at hand. Primary sources, as gleaned from clinical trials,
government reports, policy evaluations, vaccine hesitancy studies, and health equity research,
are the pillars upon which evidence-based public policies are erected. These sources bring
forth the empirical foundation for crafting sound vaccination policies. Understanding the
methodologies harnessed in these primary studies is a prerequisite for scrutinizing their
findings and discerning their applicability to the realm of public policy analysis. With
primary sources as our compass, we embark on a journey towards bolstering vaccination
rates, mitigating vaccine-preventable diseases, and optimizing public health outcomes. The
imperative for policymakers and researchers is to maintain an unwavering commitment to
evidence-driven policy formulation, ensuring the vitality of our communities’ well-being.
10
References
Ali, H. A., Hartner, A.-M., Echeverria-Londono, S., Roth, J., Li, X., Abbas, K., . . .
Gaythorpe, K. A. (2022). Vaccine equity in low and middle income countries: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health, 82.
American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2022, October). State Practice Environment.
Retrieved from American Association of Nurse Practitioners:
https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/state/state-practice-environment
Attwell, K., & Navin, M. C. (2019). Childhood Vaccination Mandates: Scope, Sanctions,
Severity, Selectivity, and Salience. Milbank Quarterly, 97(4), 978-1014.
CDC. (2020, December 14). Healthy People 2020. Retrieved from Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2020.htm
CDC. (2022, February 17). Vaccination Coverage among Adults in the United States,
National Health Interview Survey, 2019–2020. Retrieved from Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imzmanagers/coverage/adultvaxview/pubs-resources/vaccination-coverage-adults-20192020.html
de Figueiredo, A., Simas, C., Karafillakis, E., Paterson, P., & Larson, H. J. (2020). Mapping
global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a
large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study. The Lancet, 396(10255), 898-908.
Erchick, D. J., Gupta, M., Blunt, M., Bansal, A., Sauer, M., Gerste, A., . . . Limaye, R. J.
(2022). Understanding determinants of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance in India: A
qualitative study of government officials and civil society stakeholders. PLoS One.
Hansen, N. D., Molbak, K., Cox, I. J., & Lioma, C. (2019). Relationship Between Media
Coverage and Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccination Uptake in Denmark:
Retrospective Study. JMIR, 5(1), e9544.
11
Hinman, A. R., Orenstein, W. A., & Schuchat, A. (2011). Vaccine-preventable diseases,
immunizations, and MMWR–1961-2011. MMWR Supplements, 60(4), 49-57.
Ismail, S. A., Lam, S. T., Bell, S., Fouad, F. M., Blanchet, K., & Borghi, J. (2022).
Strengthening vaccination delivery system resilience in the context of protracted
humanitarian crisis: a realist-informed systematic review. BMC Health Services
Research.
Langford, A. T. (2020). Health communication and decision making about vaccine clinical
trials during a pandemic. Journal of Health Communication, 25(10), 780-789.
Limaye, R. J., Opel, D. J., Dempsey, A., Ellingson, M., Spina, C., Omer, S. B., . . . O’Leary,
S. T. (2021). Communicating With Vaccine-Hesitant Parents: A Narrative Review.
Academic Pediatrics, 21(4), S24-S29.
NICE. (2022). Evidence review for interventions to increase the uptake of routine vaccines by
improving access: Vaccie Uptake in the General Population. National Institute for
Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
Nuwarda, R. F., Ramzan, I., Weekes, L., & Kayser, V. (2022). Vaccine Hesitancy:
Contemporary Issues and Historical Background. Vaccines, 10(10), 1595.
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2021, October 27). Immunization and
Infectious Diseases. Retrieved from Office of Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion: HealthyPeople 2020: https://wayback.archiveit.org/5774/20211119191447/https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives/topic/Immunization-and-Infectious-Diseases/objectives
Orestein, W. A., & Ahmed, R. (2017). Simply put: Vaccination saves lives. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(16), 40314033.
12
Robinson, R., Nguyen, E., Wright, M., Holmes, J., Oliphant, C., Cleveland, K., & Nies, M.
A. (2022). Factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy and reduced vaccine confidence
in rural underserved populations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
9(1), 416.
Rodrigues, C. M., & Plotkin, S. A. (2020). Impact of Vaccines; Health, Economic and Social
Perspectives. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11.
Siddiqui, F. A., Padhani, Z. A., Salam, R. A., Aliani, R., Lassi, Z. S., Das, J. K., & Bhutta, Z.
A. (2022). Interventions to Improve Immunization Coverage Among Children and
Adolescents: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 149(6).
Smith, M. J., Ellenberg, S. S., Bell, L. M., & Rubin, D. M. (2008). Media coverage of the
measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism controversy and its relationship to MMR
immunization rates in the United States. Pediatrics, 121(4), e836-e843.
WHO. (2023, July 18). Immunization coverage. Retrieved from World Health Organization:
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/immunization-coverage
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
