Description
Note: You are to locate original studies with research conducted and published by the primary investigator. You may also use quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods studies, meta-analyses or Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).
REQUIREMENTS
Find and review ten (10) scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles, meta-analyses, or CPGs in support of the practice change intervention. Complete the appropriate section in the worksheet for each article.
State the PICOT question.
For each article, supply the information for each of the seven headings for the appropriate article type
PREPARING THE ASSIGNMENT:
Use the designated Research Summary Table Worksheet
All scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles must be current within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided, and the instructor has approved the use of an older reference.
Use APA 7th edition formatting for references.
DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
Assignment Criteria Points % Description
PICOT question 20 10% PICOT question provided in sentence format
Articles 1-10 15/article150 total 7.5% / article75% total For each article:
Scholarly article: US based peer reviewed journal focused for clinicians
Publication date is current within 5 years
Correctly categorizes article type
Completes all seven areas of article analysis
Explains relevance to PICOT question and implications for advanced nursing practice
APA 20 10%
Use of worksheet template
Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:
Font style and size
Citing and referencing sources
Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
Graduate-level writing style 10 5%
Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing
Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes
Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:
Font style and size
Citing and referencing sources
Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
Use of template
NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question
20 ptsExceptionalPICOT question provided in sentence format and all five attributes are listed. (Six critical elements.) 18 ptsExceedsPICOT question provided in sentence format, but one attribute is not defined. (Five critical elements.) 16 ptsMeetsPICOT question provided in sentence format, but two attributes are not defined. (Four critical elements.) 8 ptsNeeds ImprovementPICOT question is not in sentence format and/or three or more attributes are not defined. 0 ptsDevelopingPICOT question not supplied.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 1
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 2
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 3
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 4
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 5
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 6
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 7
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 8
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 9
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 10
15 ptsExceptionalPresentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.) 13 ptsExceedsPresentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type. 12 ptsMeetsPresentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type. 6 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements 0 ptsDevelopingPresentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
20 ptsExceptional
Correct APA format with 0-1 error for the following: • Font style and size • Citing and referencing sources • Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
18 ptsExceeds
APA format with 2-4 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
16 ptsMeets
APA format with 5-7 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
8 ptsNeeds Improvement
APA format with 8-9 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
0 ptsDeveloping
APA format with > 10 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing
10 ptsExceptionalDistinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Synthesis of information with no direct quotes • Use of template • Articles from scholarly sources: US based peer-reviewed journals geared for clinicians. (5 critical elements) 9 ptsExceedsGraduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by 2-4 errors total in the five critical elements. 8 ptsMeetsProficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors total in the five critical elements. 4 ptsNeeds ImprovementGraduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8-9 errors total in the five critical elements. 0 ptsDevelopingGraduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 10 or more errors total in the five critical elements.
10 pts
