Description
This assessment addresses the following course objective(s):
Consider the role of government and various professional organizations in the process of planning and implementing policies at managements levels for diverse healthcare environments.
Instructions
Professional associations like the American Medical Association, American Nurses Association, and others actively facilitate member engagement in political advocacy. For this assignment, you will research political advocacy models of professional associations, and develop a program outline to be proposed to a professional association or group of your choosing.
Objective: Political advocacy program proposal
Audience:
Primary – Members of a professional association or group (local/state/institutional).
Secondary – Leadership team of the association or group. Those who will approve your proposal.
Elements to include (but not limited to):
Proposal abstract
Need assessment (why this is needed in your profession/location)
Supporting research
Goals and Objectives
Governance structure (leadership roles)
Membership (member base, recruitment)
Proposal summary
Length: A minimum of three pages of content.
APA requirements: Title, reference page, a minimum of three references. In-text citations should be used to support your proposal.
Submit
Word document
Assignment Resources…..ATTACHED IN WORD DOCUMENT!
Assignment Rubric…..ATTACHED IN WORD DOCUMENT!
Unformatted Attachment Preview
American Nurses Association. (n.d.). AdvocacyLinks to an external site.. [Website].
https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/health-policy/health-systemreform/quality/advocacy/
National Council for the Social Studies. (n.d.). Advocacy Planning: Your 10-Step PlanLinks
to an external site.. [Website]. https://www.socialstudies.org/advocacy/advocacyplanning-your-10-step-plan-0
O’Reilly, Kevin. (2022 Jun 3). 10 principles to fix Medicare’s unsustainable physician pay
systemLinks to an external site.. American Medical Association. https://www.amaassn.org/practice-management/medicare-medicaid/10-principles-fix-medicare-sunsustainable-physician-pay
Political Advocacy Program (1)
Political Advocacy Program (1)
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeProposal
Abstract
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeNeed
Assessment
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeGoals and
Objectives
Ratings
15 pts
Level 5
Ideas and
concepts are
consistently clear
and always well
explained and
supported
13.5 pts
Level 4
Ideas and
concepts are
clear and well
explained and
supported.
12 pts
Level 3
Ideas and
concepts are
reasonably
explained and
somewhat
supported.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and
concepts are
presented; however,
they are
underdeveloped and
poorly explained.
9 pts
Level 1
Some basic
ideas and
concepts are
started, but
not developed
15 pts
Level 5
Ideas and
concepts are
consistently clear
and always well
explained and
supported
13.5 pts
Level 4
Ideas and
concepts are
clear and well
explained and
supported.
12 pts
Level 3
Ideas and
concepts are
reasonably
explained and
somewhat
supported.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and
concepts are
presented; however,
they are
underdeveloped and
poorly explained.
9 pts
Level 1
Some basic
ideas and
concepts are
started, but
not developed
15 pts
Level 5
Ideas and
concepts are
consistently clear
and always well
explained and
supported
13.5 pts
Level 4
Ideas and
concepts are
clear and well
explained and
supported.
12 pts
Level 3
Ideas and
concepts are
reasonably
explained and
somewhat
supported.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and
concepts are
presented; however,
they are
underdeveloped and
poorly explained.
9 pts
Level 1
Some basic
ideas and
concepts are
started, but
not developed
Political Advocacy Program (1)
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeGovernance
Structure
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeMembership
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeProposal
Summary
Ratings
15 pts
Level 5
Ideas and
concepts are
consistently clear
and always well
explained and
supported
13.5 pts
Level 4
Ideas and
concepts are
clear and well
explained and
supported.
12 pts
Level 3
Ideas and
concepts are
reasonably
explained and
somewhat
supported.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and
concepts are
presented; however,
they are
underdeveloped and
poorly explained.
9 pts
Level 1
Some basic
ideas and
concepts are
started, but
not developed
15 pts
Level 5
Ideas and
concepts are
consistently clear
and always well
explained and
supported
13.5 pts
Level 4
Ideas and
concepts are
clear and well
explained and
supported.
12 pts
Level 3
Ideas and
concepts are
reasonably
explained and
somewhat
supported.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and
concepts are
presented; however,
they are
underdeveloped and
poorly explained.
9 pts
Level 1
Some basic
ideas and
concepts are
started, but
not developed
25 pts
Level 5
Ideas and
concepts are
consistently clear
and always well
explained and
supported
22.5 pts
Level 4
Ideas and
concepts are
clear and well
explained and
supported.
20 pts
Level 3
Ideas and
concepts are
reasonably
explained and
somewhat
supported.
17.5 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and
concepts are
presented; however,
they are
underdeveloped and
poorly explained.
15 pts
Level 1
Some basic
ideas and
concepts are
started, but
not developed
Political Advocacy Program (1)
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeWriting
Conventions
10 pts
Level 5
The paper
exhibits a
superior
command of
written
English
language
conventions.
The paper has
no errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling.
9 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits
a stronger
command of
written English
language
conventions. The
paper has no
errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
impair the flow of
communication.
8 pts
Level 3
The paper
exhibits a
command of
written English
language
conventions. The
paper has minor
errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
impact the flow of
communication.
7 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits
a limited
command of
written English
language
conventions. The
paper has frequent
errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
impede the flow
of
communication.
6 pts
Level 1
The paper
exhibits little
command of
written English
language
conventions.
The paper has
errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
cause the
reader to stop
and reread
parts of the
writing to
discern
meaning.
Political Advocacy Program (1)
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeAPA
10 pts
Level
The required
APA elements
are all included
with correct
formatting,
including intext citations
and references.
9 pts
Level 4
The required
APA elements
are all included
with minor
formatting
errors,
including intext citations
and references.
8 pts
Level 3
The required
APA elements
are all included
with multiple
formatting
errors,
including intext citations
and references.
7 pts
Level 2
The required
APA elements
are not all
included and/or
there are major
formatting
errors, including
in-text citations
and references.
6 pts
Level 1
Several APA
elements are
missing. The errors
in formatting
demonstrate a
limited
understanding of
APA guidelines, intext-citations, and
references.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
