Description
Course Project Part II: Prevention
Unit 4: Introduction (1 of 5)
Unit 4: Reading and Activities (2 of 5)
Current Assignment: Unit 4: Assignment Course Project Part II: Prevention (3 of 5)
Unit 4: Discussion Mental Health in Rural Areas (4 of 5)
9780826164407_ch12.pptx, File (5 of 5)
Instructions
Consider the mental health issue you identified in Unit 3. Please provide the following in a 1-2 page Word document:
Identify the community health issue in which you are interested.
Recommend at least one primary prevention measure to address this mental health issue with clear examples.
Recommend at least one secondary prevention measure to address this mental health issue with clear examples.
Provide at least one tertiary prevention measure to address this mental health issue with clear examples.
Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Rubric
MSW628 Course Project Part II Rubric
MSW628 Course Project Part II Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentOrganization, coherence, preparation
30 pts
Mastered
Writing demonstrates clear organization, an introduction, summary and a logical sequencing of information with transitions to tie ideas together. The writing is insightful and evidences preparation.
27 pts
Excels
Writing demonstrates organization, an introduction, summary and some logical sequencing of information with some transitions to tie ideas together. The writing is thoughtful and evidences preparation.
24 pts
Competent
Writing demonstrates some organization, there is an attempt at including an introduction, summary and sequencing of information with some transitions to tie ideas together. The writing evidences some preparation.
21 pts
Low-Level Competency
Writing demonstrates some organization, and sequencing of information. There is little evidence of preparation.
18 pts
Needs Improvement
Writing demonstrates little or no organization, and minimal sequencing of information. There is no evidence of preparation.
0 pts
Not Attempted
There is no attempt to organize the information in a thoughtful or presentable manner.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritingMechanics, language, grammar, length
10 pts
Mastered
The writing exhibits an excellent command of standard written English language conventions. The writing has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. The writing is presented in a scholarly/technical style. Excellent vocabulary choices are used and appropriate to the topic and technical requirements of the topic. The correct tense and point of view is evidenced throughout the writing. Meets or exceeds the length requirement.
9 pts
Excels
The writing exhibits a strong command of standard written English language conventions. The writing has 1-2 errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. The writing is presented in a scholarly/technical style. Vocabulary choices used are appropriate to the topic and technical requirements of the topic. The correct tense and point of view is evidenced throughout most of the writing. Meets the length requirement
8 pts
Competent
The writing exhibits understanding of standard written English language conventions. The writing has 2-3 errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. The writing mixes informal/scholarly/technical styles. Vocabulary choices used are appropriate to the topic and technical requirements of the topic. The correct tense and point of view is evidenced throughout most of the writing. Meets the length requirement.
7 pts
Low-Level Competency
The writing exhibits minimal evidence of standard written English language conventions. The writing has 6 or more errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. The writing style is mostly informal. Vocabulary choices do not support the topic or technical requirements of the topic. There are major tense and point of view errors evident. Does not meet the length requirement.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Writing demonstrates little or no organization, and minimal sequencing of information. There is no evidence of preparation.
0 pts
Not Attempted
The writing does not exhibit evidence of standard written English language conventions. The writing has 6 or more errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. The lack of writing style inhibits clear communication. Vocabulary choices include improper usage, slang, text speak, or other non-standard word usage. The tense and point of view are inconsistent throughout the writing. Does not meet the length requirement.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAAppearance and formatting
10 pts
Mastered
The writing format demonstrates all of the required APA elements, including the full use of in-text citations and references. There are a minimum of six articles provided
9 pts
Excels
The writing format demonstrates all of the required APA elements, including the full use of in-text citations and references, but 1-2 minor errors are evident. There are a minimum of 5 articles provided
8 pts
Competent
The writing format demonstrates most of the required APA elements, including the full use of in-text citations and references, but 2-3 minor errors are evident. There are a minimum of 4 articles provided
7 pts
Low-Level Competency
The writing format includes most of the required APA elements, including the use of in-text citations and references, but more than 3 minor errors are evident. There are less than three articles provided
6 pts
Needs Improvement
The writing format includes most of the required APA elements, including the use of in-text citations and references, but more than 3 minor errors are evident. There are less than three articles provided
0 pts
Not Attempted
The writing format includes most of the required APA elements, including the use of in-text citations and references, but more than 3 minor errors are evident.
10 pts
Total Points: 50
