Description
This assignment is a 4 to 5 minutes video using a power point presentation.
Topic and positions: SUPPORT insurance coverage for healthcare provider activity in online patient portal messaging.
Once you receive your topic and position, prepare to create a video that will be due in Week 5.
The video should be 4-5 minutes long and address the topic and viewpoint you were assigned.
You may not be personally in support or opposition of the topic; however, it is your job to convince your peers of your position. Include evidence that supports the viewpoint.
Include an introduction to the issue, your stance, the rationale for the stance, the ethical principals involved, theories and evidence supporting your position, and your proposed resolution. Review the rubric in this forum for complete grading criteria.
Your video should include both audio and visual components such a graphics or charts. You can choose to do a PowerPoint, yourself on video with a poster or visual aids, or anything that supports and convinces your peers of your stance.
Get creative! Be succinct but convincing. If you go over the time limit, you will only be graded on the first 5 minutes.
Please post your video using Canvas Studio or Panopto.
Rubric NURS_510_DE – Ethical Issues Debate Project
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 5 Video Overall Presentation
20 to >16.4 pts
Accomplished (80-100%)
Presentation is well organized and approximately 4-5 minutes in length. Audio is clear and reasonably paced. Visual component compliments audio component. Discussion reflects an atmosphere of mutual respect.
16.4 to >15.0 pts
Emerging (60-79%)
Presentation is fairly organized, but there are several areas of improvement. Presentation is less than 4-5 minutes in length and some areas are not addressed. Audio needs some improvements. Visual component needs work. Discussion reflects an atmosphere of mutual respect.
15 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory (0-59%)
Presentation is unorganized and lacks structure. Presentation is extremely limited. Audio is absent or needs significant improvements. Visual component is absent or severely lacking.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 5 Video: Ethical Issues, Concern, & Proposed Resolution
60 to >49.2 pts
Accomplished (80-100%)
There is a clear description of the ethical issue including a proposed resolution. The issue topic is a current issue of debate and related to health care. The issue has a clearly defined dilemma with more than one resolution. Ethical principles and theories involved with the ethical issue are clearly identified and explained.
49.2 to >45.0 pts
Emerging (60-79%)
Description of the ethical issue, the dilemma, and/or proposed resolution is lacking some details and relevant information.
45 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory (0-59%)
Description of the ethical issue, the dilemma, and/or proposed resolution is absent or severely lacking.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 5 Video: Supporting Argument/Stance
40 to >32.8 pts
Accomplished (80-100%)
Supporting argument is well developed either for or against the issue. Factors supporting the stance are well identified. Ethical principles and theories involved with the ethical issue are clearly identified and explained and in alignment with the viewpoint.
32.8 to >30.0 pts
Emerging (60-79%)
Proposed resolution supporting your argument is not well defined. Key stakeholders and factors supporting your resolution are not clearly identified.
30 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory (0-59%)
Proposed resolution supporting your argument is absent or ill defined. Key stakeholders and factors supporting your resolution are absent or poorly identified.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 6 Rebuttal
40 to >32.8 pts
Accomplished (80-100%)
Rebuttal to classmate’s post is complete and includes key points including stakeholders, essential factors, and important facts supporting the resolution. The rebuttal reflected an atmosphere of mutual respect. Policy drivers and ethical principles involved are clearly identified and explained in support or opposition of the resolution.
32.8 to >30.0 pts
Emerging (60-79%)
Rebuttal to classmate’s post is incomplete and missing some key points regarding stakeholders, essential factors, and important facts supporting the resolution. Policy drivers and ethical principles involved are not clearly identified and explained in support or opposition of the resolution.
30 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory (0-59%)
Rebuttal to classmates’ post is absent or largely incomplete. Key points regarding stakeholders, essential factors, and important facts supporting the resolution are absent or severely lacking. Policy drivers and ethical principles involved and in support or opposition of the resolution are absent or severely lacking.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWeek 6 Rebuttal: Participation
40 to >32.8 pts
Accomplished (80-100%)
The minimum number of postings were met. The student followed netiquette in addition to the posting timeframe to contribute throughout the week.
32.8 to >30.0 pts
Emerging (60-79%)
Less than the minimum number of postings were evident. The student mostly followed netiquette and met most of the posting timeframe to contribute throughout the week.
30 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory (0-59%)
There was a severe deficit in contribution. Less than the minimum number of postings were evident. The student did not follow netiquette and did not meet the participation requirements.
40 pts
Total Points: 200
