Description
The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of risk management strategies in a health care organization.
In this assignment, you will develop an “in‐service”‐style educational risk management program presentation for the employer and employees of a particular health care organization. Select your topic for this educational session from one of the proposed recommendations or changes you suggested in the Topic 1 benchmark assignment to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards in your chosen risk management plan example.
Develop a 10-12-slide presentation (including a title slide, a reference slide, and slide notes that provide a detailed explanation of your research) that outlines the following points about your chosen topic:
Introduction: Identify the risk management topic you have chosen to address and explain why it is important within your health care sector.
Rationale: Explain how this risk management strategy is lacking within your selected organization’s current risk management plan and describe how its responsibility for implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards.
Support: Provide data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management initiative and explain how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility to provide a safe health care facility and work environment.
Implementation: Describe the steps to implement the proposed strategy in your selected health care organization.
Challenges: Predict obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk management strategy and challenges for building a culture of faith, compassion, and concern for patients, families, and employees, and propose solutions to navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes.
Evaluation: Outline your plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program and how well it meets compliance with operational risk management policies in the organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals, which includes key employer and employee metrics that will be used for measuring the success of the risk management program.
Opportunities: Recommend additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward.
In addition to your textbook and the GCU “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work,” you are required to support your analysis with at least three credible health-related resources and at least three peer-reviewed resources.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Collapse All
Educational Program on Risk Management – Rubric
Introduction
20 points
Criteria Description
Identification of the risk management topic chosen and explanation of why it is
important within the health care sector.
5. Target
20 points
Identification of the risk management topic chosen and explanation of why it is
important within the health care sector are comprehensive. The submission
encompasses essential details and provides convincing support.
4. Acceptable
17 points
Identification of the risk management topic chosen and explanation of why it is
important within the health care sector are incorporated in full. The submission
encompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.
3. Approaching
15 points
Identification of the risk management topic chosen and explanation of why it is
important within the health care sector are incorporated, but minimal detail or
support is provided for one or more components.
2. Insufficient
13 points
Identification of the risk management topic chosen and explanation of why it is
important within the health care sector are partially incorporated, but the
information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Identification of the risk management topic chosen and explanation of why it is
important within the health care sector are not included.
Rationale
Criteria Description
Explanation of how this risk management strategy is lacking within the selected
organization’s current risk management plan and how its responsibility for
implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards.
20 points
5. Target
20 points
Explanation of how this risk management strategy is lacking within the selected
organization’s current risk management plan and how its responsibility for
implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards is
comprehensive. The submission encompasses essential details and provides
convincing support.
4. Acceptable
17 points
Explanation of how this risk management strategy is lacking within the selected
organization’s current risk management plan and how its responsibility for
implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards is
incorporated in full. The submission encompasses basic details and provides
appropriate support.
3. Approaching
15 points
Explanation of how this risk management strategy is lacking within the selected
organization’s current risk management plan and how its responsibility for
implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards is
incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more
components.
2. Insufficient
13 points
Explanation of how this risk management strategy is lacking within the selected
organization’s current risk management plan and how its responsibility for
implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards is
partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Explanation of how this risk management strategy is lacking within the selected
organization’s current risk management plan and how its responsibility for
implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards is
not included.
Support
Criteria Description
Provision of data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management initiative
and explanation of how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility to provide a
safe health care facility and work environment.
20 points
5. Target
20 points
Provision of data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management
initiative and explanation of how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility
to provide a safe health care facility and work environment is comprehensive. The
submission encompasses essential details and provides convincing support.
4. Acceptable
17 points
Provision of data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management
initiative and explanation of how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility
to provide a safe health care facility and work environment is incorporated in full.
The submission encompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.
3. Approaching
15 points
Provision of data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management
initiative and explanation of how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility
to provide a safe health care facility and work environment is incorporated, but
minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
2. Insufficient
13 points
Provision of data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management
initiative and explanation of how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility
to provide a safe health care facility and work environment is partially incorporated,
but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Provision of data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management
initiative and explain how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility to
provide a safe health care facility and work environment is not included.
Implementation
20 points
Criteria Description
Description of the steps to implement the proposed strategy in the selected health
care organization.
5. Target
20 points
Description of the steps to implement the proposed strategy in the selected health
care organization is comprehensive. The submission encompasses essential details
and provides convincing support.
4. Acceptable
17 points
Description of the steps to implement the proposed strategy in the selected health
care organization is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses basic details
and provides appropriate support.
3. Approaching
15 points
Description of the steps to implement the proposed strategy in the selected health
care organization is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one
or more components.
2. Insufficient
13 points
Description of the steps to implement the proposed strategy in the selected health
care organization is partially incorporated, but the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of the steps to implement the proposed strategy in the selected health
care organization is not included.
Challenges
20 points
Criteria Description
Prediction of obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk
management strategy and challenges for building a culture of faith, compassion, and
concern for patients, families, and employees, and proposal of solutions to navigate or
preempt these potentially difficult outcomes
5. Target
20 points
Prediction of obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk
management strategy and challenges for building a culture of faith, compassion,
and concern for patients, families, and employees, and proposal of solutions to
navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes is comprehensive. The
submission encompasses essential details and provides convincing support.
4. Acceptable
17 points
Prediction of obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk
management strategy and challenges for building a culture of faith, compassion,
and concern for patients, families, and employees, and proposal of solutions to
navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes is incorporated in full. The
submission encompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.
3. Approaching
15 points
Prediction of obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk
management strategy and challenges for building a culture of faith, compassion,
and concern for patients, families, and employees, and proposal of solutions to
navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes is incorporated, but
minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
2. Insufficient
13 points
Prediction of obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk
management strategy and challenges for building a culture of faith, compassion,
and concern for patients, families, and employees, and proposal of solutions to
navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes is partially incorporated,
but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Prediction of obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk
management strategy and challenges for building a culture of faith, compassion,
and concern for patients, families, and employees, and proposal of solutions to
navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes is not included.
Evaluation
20 points
Criteria Description
Outline of plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program and
how well it meets compliance with operational risk management policies in the
organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals, which includes key employer and
employee metrics that will be used for measuring the success of the risk management
program.
5. Target
20 points
Outline of plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program
and how well it meets compliance with operational risk management policies in the
organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals, which includes key employer
and employee metrics that will be used for measuring the success of the risk
management program, is comprehensive. The submission encompasses essential
details and provides convincing support.
4. Acceptable
17 points
Outline of plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program
and how well it meets compliance with operational risk management policies in the
organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals, which includes key employer
and employee metrics that will be used for measuring the success of the risk
management program, is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses basic
details and provides appropriate support.
3. Approaching
15 points
Outline of plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program
and how well it meets compliance with operational risk management policies in the
organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals, which includes key employer
and employee metrics that will be used for measuring the success of the risk
management program, is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided
for one or more components.
2. Insufficient
13 points
Outline of plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program
and how well it meets compliance with operational risk management policies in the
organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals, which includes key employer
and employee metrics that will be used for measuring the success of the risk
management program, is partially incorporated, but the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Outline of plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program
and how well it meets compliance with operational risk management policies in the
organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals, which includes key employer
and employee metrics that will be used for measuring the success of the risk
management program, is not included.
Opportunities
20 points
Criteria Description
Recommendation of additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas of
influence that the organization could or should address moving forward.
5. Target
20 points
Recommendation of additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas
of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward is
comprehensive. The submission encompasses essential details and provides
convincing support.
4. Acceptable
17 points
Recommendation of additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas
of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward is
incorporated in full. The submission encompasses basic details and provides
appropriate support.
3. Approaching
15 points
Recommendation of additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas
of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward is
incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more
components.
2. Insufficient
13 points
Recommendation of additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas
of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward is
partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Recommendation of additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas
of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward is not
included.
Presentation of Content
20 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
20 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to
each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers.
The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable
17 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting
information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes
persuasive information from reliable sources.
3. Approaching
15 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some
inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
2. Insufficient
13 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong
sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.
Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
Layout
10 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
10 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with
appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in
length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance
the readability of the text.
4. Acceptable
8.5 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to
be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for
headings and text.
3. Approaching
7.5 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the
fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
2. Insufficient
6.5 points
The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with
large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult
due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background,
overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and
subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with
long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors.
Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
Language Use and Audience Awareness
10 points
Criteria Description
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
5. Target
10 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word
choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline,
and scope.
4. Acceptable
8.5 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for
the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
3. Approaching
7.5 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
2. Insufficient
6.5 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech
appropriately.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer
appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either
does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Mechanics of Writing
10 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target
10 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
8.5 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching
7.5 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
6.5 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
10 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
10 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable
8.5 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
7.5 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient
6.5 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 200 points
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
