Description
Below I have added total of 3 assignments. Let me know. Thank you.
ASSIGMENT 2
For this assessment, you will create a 2–4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.
Collapse All
Introduction
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).
You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
REFERENCE
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/de…
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Professional Context
This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.
Scenario
This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.
For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] Download Interview Guide [DOCX]for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.
Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.
When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], Download Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX],which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
View Scoring Guide
.
.
.
ASSIGNMENT 3
For this assessment you will create a 2–4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.
Collapse All
Introduction
The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.
You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
REFERENCE
Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Family Practice, 17.
Professional Context
This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.
Scenario
Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.
Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.
Instructions
For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.
The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.
Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] Download Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX]will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
View Scoring Guide
.
.
.
ASSIGNMENT 4
For this assessment you will create an 8–12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.
Expand All
Introduction
As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement. The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter.
You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will create the opportunity to check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this formative will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.
Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.
Professional Context
This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.
Scenario
In addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study. However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA.
When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.
Instructions
Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.
Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:
Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.
What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?
Why should the audience care about solving it?
Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.
Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?
How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?
Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.
What is the objective?
How likely is it to work?
What will the interdisciplinary team do?
Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.
How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?
How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?
How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?
Part 5: Evaluation.
What would a successful outcome of the project look like?
What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?
How could this be used to show the degree of success?
Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.
Additional Requirements
Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
View Scoring Guide
Unformatted Attachment Preview
9/27/23, 12:04 PM
Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Scoring Guide
Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Scoring Guide
NONPERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Summarize an
interview focused on
past or current issues
at a health care
organization.
Does not
summarize an
interview
focused on past
or current issues
at a health care
organization.
Discusses an interview,
but the focus of the
interview, the issues
addressed, or the
specifics of health care
organizational context
are unclear or missing.
Summarizes an
interview focused on
past or current issues
at a health care
organization.
Summarizes an
interview focused on
past or current issues at
a health care
organization. Notes
strategies employed in
the interview to ensure
that sufficient
information was
gathered.
Identify an issue from
an interview for which
an evidence-based
interdisciplinary
approach would be
appropriate.
Does not identify
an issue from an
interview for
which an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary
approach would
be appropriate.
Identifies an issue with
an unclear connection
to the interview or for
which an evidencebased interdisciplinary
approach seems
inappropriate.
Identifies an issue from
an interview for which
an evidence-based
interdisciplinary
approach would be
appropriate.
Identifies an issue from
an interview for which
an evidence-based
interdisciplinary
approach would be
appropriate, providing
one or more specific
reasons to justify this
approach.
Describe potential
change theories and
leadership strategies
that could help
develop an
interdisciplinary
solution to an
organizational issue.
Does not
describe
potential change
theories and
leadership
strategies that
could help
develop an
interdisciplinary
solution to an
organizational
issue.
Identifies change
theories and leadership
strategies that are
unclear, incomplete, or
irrelevant to developing
an interdisciplinary
solution to an
organizational issue.
Describes potential
change theories and
leadership strategies
that could help develop
an interdisciplinary
solution to an
organizational issue.
Describes potential
change theories and
leadership strategies
that could help develop
an interdisciplinary
solution to an
organizational issue.
Notes which sources
seem most credible or
relevant to the specific
organizational issue.
Describe
collaborative
approaches from the
literature that could
be relevant in
establishing or
improving an
interdisciplinary team
to address an
organizational issue.
Does not
describe
collaborative
approaches from
the literature that
could be
relevant in
establishing or
improving an
interdisciplinary
team to address
an
organizational
issue.
Identifies collaborative
approaches from the
literature but the
relevance to
establishing or
improving an
interdisciplinary team to
address an
organizational issue is
unclear or insufficiently
explained.
Describes collaborative
approaches from the
literature that could be
relevant in establishing
or improving an
interdisciplinary team
to address an
organizational issue.
Describes collaborative
approaches from the
literature that could be
relevant in establishing
or improving an
interdisciplinary team to
address an
organizational issue.
Notes which sources
seem most credible or
relevant to the specific
organizational issue.
Organize content so
ideas flow logically
with smooth
transitions; contains
few errors in
grammar/punctuation,
word choice, and
spelling.
Does not
organize content
for ideas. Lacks
logical flow and
smooth
transitions.
Organizes content with
some logical flow and
smooth transitions.
Contains errors in
grammar/punctuation,
word choice, and
spelling.
Organizes content so
ideas flow logically with
smooth transitions;
contains few errors in
grammar/punctuation,
word choice, and
spelling.
Organizes content with
a clear purpose.
Content flows logically
with smooth transitions
using coherent
paragraphs, correct
grammar/punctuation,
CRITERIA
https://a21371-900634.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6365/files/21371~900634/course files/Scoring Guides/a02_scoring_guide.… 1/2
9/27/23, 12:04 PM
CRITERIA
Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Scoring Guide
NONPERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
word choice, and free of
spelling errors.
Apply APA formatting
to in-text citations
and references
exhibiting nearly
flawless adherence to
APA format.
Does not apply
APA formatting
to headings, intext citations,
and references.
Does not use
quotes or
paraphrase
correctly.
Applies APA formatting
to in-text citations,
headings and
references incorrectly
and/or inconsistently,
detracting noticeable
from the content.
Inconsistently uses
headings, quotes
and/or paraphrasing.
Applies APA formatting
to in-text citations and
references, exhibiting
nearly flawless
adherence to APA
format.
Exhibits strict and
flawless adherence to
APA formatting of
headings, in-text
citations, and
references. Quotes and
paraphrases correctly.
https://a21371-900634.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6365/files/21371~900634/course files/Scoring Guides/a02_scoring_guide.… 2/2
9/27/23, 12:12 PM
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Scoring Guide
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Scoring Guide
CRITERIA
NONPERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Describe an objective
and predictions for an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan
to achieve a specific
goal related to
improving patient or
organizational
outcomes.
Does not
describe an
objective and
predictions for
an evidencebased
interdisciplinary
plan to achieve a
specific goal
related to
improving patient
or organizational
outcomes.
Identifies an objective
for an evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan
but does not clearly
explain how the
objective will help
achieve a specific goal
related to improving
patient or
organizational
outcomes.
Describes an objective
and predictions for an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan to
achieve a specific goal
related to improving
patient or
organizational
outcomes.
Describes an objective
and predictions for an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan to
achieve a specific goal
related to improving
patient or organizational
outcomes, including
methods from the
literature that may be
used to determine
success.
Explain a change
theory and a
leadership strategy,
supported by relevant
evidence, that is most
likely to help an
interdisciplinary team
succeed in
collaborating and
implementing, or
creating buy-in for,
the project plan.
Does not explain
a change theory
and a leadership
strategy,
supported by
relevant
evidence, that is
most likely to
help an
interdisciplinary
team succeed in
collaborating and
implementing, or
creating buy-in
for, the project
plan.
Describes a change
theory and a leadership
strategy but the
relevance to the
success of
interdisciplinary team in
collaborating and
implementing, or
creating buy-in for, the
project plan is not
clearly explained and
no evidence is
provided.
Explains a change
theory and a
leadership strategy,
supported by relevant
evidence, that is most
likely to help an
interdisciplinary team
succeed in
collaborating and
implementing, or
creating buy-in for, the
project plan.
Explains a change
theory and a leadership
strategy, supported by
relevant evidence, that
is most likely to help an
interdisciplinary team
succeed in collaborating
and implementing, or
creating buy-in for, the
project plan, providing
real-world examples
relevant to the health
care organization that is
the context for the plan.
Explain the
collaboration needed
by an
interdisciplinary team
to improve the
likelihood of
achieving the plan’s
objective, including
best practices of
interdisciplinary
collaboration from the
literature.
Does not explain
the collaboration
needed by an
interdisciplinary
team to improve
the likelihood of
achieving the
plan’s objective.
Does not cite
best practices of
interdisciplinary
collaboration
from the
literature.
Explains collaboration
but not in terms of an
interdisciplinary team
or does not include
best practices from the
literature.
Explains the
collaboration needed
by an interdisciplinary
team to improve the
likelihood of achieving
the plan’s objective,
including best practices
of interdisciplinary
collaboration from the
literature.
Explains the
collaboration needed by
an interdisciplinary
team to improve the
likelihood of achieving
the plan’s objective,
including best practices
of interdisciplinary
collaboration from the
literature. Provides realworld examples
relevant to the health
care organization that is
the context for the plan.
Explain
organizational
resources, including
a financial budget,
needed for the plan to
succeed and the
impacts on those
resources if nothing
is done to make the
improvements sought
by the plan.
Does not explain
organizational
resources,
including a
financial budget,
needed for the
plan to succeed
and the impacts
on those
resources if
nothing is done
to make the
Identifies
organizational
resources needed for
the plan to succeed
and the impacts on
those resources if
nothing is done to
make the
improvements sought
by the plan. Does not
include a financial
budget.
Explains organizational
resources, including a
financial budget,
needed for the plan to
succeed and the
impacts on those
resources if nothing is
done to make the
improvements sought
by the plan.
Explains organizational
resources, including a
financial budget,
needed for the plan to
succeed and the
impacts on those
resources if nothing is
done to make the
improvements sought
by the plan. Provides
real-world examples
relevant to the health
https://a21371-900622.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6365/files/21371~900622/course files/Scoring Guides/a03_scoring_guide.… 1/2
9/27/23, 12:12 PM
CRITERIA
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Scoring Guide
NONimprovements
PERFORMANCE
sought
by the
BASIC
PROFICIENT
care
organization that is
DISTINGUISHED
the context for the plan.
plan.
Organize content so
ideas flow logically
with smooth
transitions; contains
few errors in
grammar/punctuation,
word choice, and
spelling.
Does not
organize content
for ideas. Lacks
logical flow and
smooth
transitions.
Organizes content with
some logical flow and
smooth transitions.
Contains errors in
grammar/punctuation,
word choice, and
spelling.
Organizes content so
ideas flow logically with
smooth transitions;
contains few errors in
grammar/punctuation,
word choice, and
spelling.
Organizes content with
a clear purpose.
Content flows logically
with smooth transitions
using coherent
paragraphs, correct
grammar/punctuation,
word choice, and free of
spelling errors.
Apply APA formatting
to in-text citations
and references,
exhibiting nearly
flawless adherence to
APA format.
Does not apply
APA formatting
to headings, intext citations,
and references.
Does not use
quotes or
paraphrase
correctly.
Applies APA formatting
to in-text citations,
headings and
references incorrectly
and/or inconsistently,
detracting noticeably
from the content.
Inconsistently uses
headings, quotes
and/or paraphrasing.
Applies APA formatting
to in-text citations and
references, exhibiting
nearly flawless
adherence to APA
format.
Exhibits strict and
flawless adherence to
APA formatting of
headings, in-text
citations, and
references. Quotes and
paraphrases correctly.
https://a21371-900622.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6365/files/21371~900622/course files/Scoring Guides/a03_scoring_guide.… 2/2
9/27/23, 12:17 PM
Stakeholder Presentation Scoring Guide
Stakeholder Presentation Scoring Guide
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Explain an
organizational or
patient issue for
which a
collaborative
interdisciplinary
team approach
would help achieve
a specific
improvement goal.
Does not describe an
organizational or patient
issue for which a
collaborative
interdisciplinary team
approach would help
achieve a specific
improvement goal.
Describes an
organizational or
patient issue but the
way in which a
collaborative
interdisciplinary
team approach
would help achieve
a specific
improvement goal is
unclear or missing.
Explains an
organizational or
patient issue for
which a
collaborative
interdisciplinary
team approach
would help achieve
a specific
improvement goal.
Explains an
organizational or patient
issue for which a
collaborative
interdisciplinary team
approach would help
achieve a specific
improvement goal,
noting potential
consequences of not
addressing the issue.
Summarize an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary
plan to address an
organizational or
patient issue.
Does not summarize an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan to
address an
organizational or patient
issue.
Discusses an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary
plan, but its
relevance to an
organizational or
patient issue is
unclear.
Summarizes an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary
plan to address an
organizational or
patient issue.
Summarizes an
evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan to
address an
organizational or patient
issue, noting specific
sources of evidence
used to develop the
plan.
Explain how the
interdisciplinary
plan could be
implemented and
how the human and
financial resources
would be managed.
Does not explain how
the interdisciplinary plan
could be implemented
and how the human and
financial resources
would be managed.
Explains how the
interdisciplinary
plan could be
implemented or
how the human and
financial resources
would be managed,
but not both.
Explains how the
interdisciplinary
plan could be
implemented and
how the human and
financial resources
would be managed.
Explains how the
interdisciplinary plan
could be implemented
and how the human and
financial resources
would be managed,
providing real-world
examples relevant to
the context of the health
care organization.
Propose evidencebased criteria to
evaluate the degree
to which the project
was successful in
achieving the
improvement goal.
Does not propose
evidence-based criteria
to evaluate the degree to
which the project was
successful in achieving
the improvement goal.
Proposes irrelevant
criteria or criteria
not based in
evidence to
evaluate the degree
to which the project
was successful in
achieving the
improvement goal.
Proposes
evidence-based
criteria to evaluate
the degree to which
the project was
successful in
achieving the
improvement goal.
Proposes evidencebased criteria to
evaluate the degree to
which the project was
successful in achieving
the improvement goal,
noting specific sources
of evidence used to
develop the criteria.
Slides are easy to
read and error free.
Detailed speaker
notes are provided.
Slides are difficult to
read with multiple editing
errors. No speaker notes
provided.
Slides are easy to
read with few
editing errors.
Speaker notes are
sufficient to support
the slides.
Slides are easy to
read and error free.
Detailed speaker
notes are provided.
Slides are easy to read
and clutter free. Slide
background is “visually”
pleasing with a
contrasting color for the
text and may utilize
graphics. Detailed
speaker notes are
provided.
Organize content
with clear purpose
/goals and with
relevant and
evidence-based
sources (published
Does not organize
content with clear
purpose/goals. Power
point slides do not
support main points,
assertions, arguments,
Organizes content
with clear
purpose/goals and
with relevant and
evidence-based
sources (published
Organizes content
with clear purpose
/goals and with
relevant and
evidence-based
sources (published
Organizes content with
clear purpose/goals.
Power point slides
support main points,
assertions, arguments,
conclusions, or
https://a21371-900630.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6365/files/21371~900630/course files/Scoring Guides/a04_scoring_guide.… 1/2
9/27/23, 12:17 PM
Stakeholder Presentation Scoring Guide
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
within 5 years) with
an APA formatted
reference list with
few errors.
conclusions, or
recommendations.
Sources are not relevant
and/or evidence-based
(published within 5
years). No reference list
provided.
within 5 years) with
a reference list not
in APA format/or
has many errors in
format.
within 5 years) with
an APA formatted
reference list with
few errors.
recommendations with
relevant and evidencebased sources
(published within 5
years) with a flawless
APA formatted reference
list.
https://a21371-900630.cluster223.canvas-user-content.com/courses/21371~6365/files/21371~900630/course files/Scoring Guides/a04_scoring_guide.… 2/2
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
