Description

An article summary table is a tool that can help you organize, summarize, and keep track of what you’ve read. Keep in mind the end goal is to present a thesis statement – evidence – evidence-based recommendations/solutions. For this assignment, begin to organize and summarize the articles you have read that will be helpful to you when writing your scholarly paper by completing the table for 3 of the article and format a reference list with a total of 5 peer reviewed scholarly articles that you intend to use for your paper.Directions:Please complete and submit the table and reference list below using a minimum of 5 articles from the professional literature (NURSING preferred). Please submit your work as a Word doc.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Approved Topic:_______________________________________________________________
Literature Summary
Find 5 current peer reviewed scholarly articles related to your topic that may be helpful when
writing your paper.
Part 1: Complete the table below using one box for each of three of the five articles you found
on your topic. Synthesize the findings. After completing the table, review the “Findings”
section of each article. What solutions do some (or all) of the articles have in common? Is there
any overlap?
Part 2: Complete a fully formatted APA 7th edition reference page with a heading for all five
of the articles.
Article #1
Year/Location
Purpose
Findings
Factors
Which factors were discussed? (i.e. legal, spiritual, ethical, cultural, financial)
Discussed
Areas of
Nursing
Discussed
Which areas were specifically discussed? (i.e. practice, administration,
education, research, other)
Impact on
Profession as
a whole
Critically think about the impact on the nursing profession as a whole (i.e.
pros/cons, advantages/disadvantages, driver of change, etc.)
Article #2
Year/Location
Purpose
Findings
Factors
Which factors were discussed? (i.e. legal, spiritual, ethical, cultural, financial)
Discussed
Areas of
Nursing
Discussed
Which areas were specifically discussed? (i.e. practice, administration,
education, research, other)
Impact on
Profession as
a whole
Critically think about the impact on the nursing profession as a whole (i.e.
pros/cons, advantages/disadvantages, driver of change, etc.)
Article #3
Year/Location
Purpose
Findings
Factors
Which factors were discussed? (i.e. legal, spiritual, ethical, cultural, financial)
Discussed
Areas of
Nursing
Discussed
Which areas were specifically discussed? (i.e. practice, administration,
education, research, other)
Impact on
Profession as
a whole
Critically think about the impact on the nursing profession as a whole (i.e.
pros/cons, advantages/disadvantages, driver of change, etc.)
Synthesize the findings:
After completing the table, review the “Findings” section of each article. What solutions do some
(or all) of the articles have in common? Is there any overlap?
Scroll down to complete Part 2 on a new page.
Please use formatting guidelines from APA 7th edition for margins, font, heading, hanging indent
and double spacing.
References
Literature Summary (1)
Literature Summary (1)
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeSource
Relevance
20 pts
16 pts
12 pts
0 pts
Provides relevant
background for 3
articles that will
contribute to the
development of the
paper
Contains fewer
than 3 articles OR
may not be fully
developed and
may be lacking in
key details
Contains fewer
than 3 articles
AND is not fully
developed or is
lacking in key
details
No
Marks
Identifies time/place;
Summarizes the purpose and
findings;
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeContent
Relevance
Identifies:
Factors Discussed (legal;
ethical; spiritual; cultural;
financial) and
Areas of Nursing Discussed
(practice; administration;
education; research;
profession as a whole)
Pts
20 pt
20 pts
16 pts
12 pts
0 pts
Table is complete
with minimal or no
gaps in specific
data needed to
develop scholarly
paper
Table is mostly
complete with no
more than 2 gaps in
specific data
needed to develop
scholarly paper
Table missing 3
or more areas of
relevant data
needed to
develop
scholarly paper
Table
format is
omitted
10 pts
6 pts
0 pts
No errors
1 or more errors
No Marks
20 pt
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeHeading
and Format
“References”, Centered,
Bold, 12 TNR font
Hanging indent; Double
spaced throughout;
Alphabetical Order
10 pt
Literature Summary (1)
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeSources
10 pts
6 pts
0 pts
No more than 1 error
2 or
more
errors
No
Marks
At least 5 (total) references
for peer reviewed scholarly
articles from the nursing
literature relative to the
topic current within the last
5 years
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeAuthor(s)
and Date
Listed in correct format; Uses
correct punctuation; Appears
in the correct place within
the reference
Pts
At least 5 sources identified; all sources are peer
reviewed scholarly articles; all sources are from the
nursing literature; all sources are relative to the topic;
all sources are current within the last 5 years
10 pts
6 pts
0 pts
No more than 1 error
2 or more errors
No Marks
10 pts
6 pts
0 pts
No more than 1 error
2 or more errors
No Marks
10 pts
6 pts
0 pts
No more than 1 error
2 or more errors
No Marks
10 pt
10 pt
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeTitle listed
in correct format
Uses sentence case
(capitalize first word in title
and subtitle);
Appears in the correct place
within the reference; correct
punctuation
This criterion is linked to a
Learning
OutcomePublication Name
listed in correct format
Uses title case (each word
capitalized);
Italicized;
Appears in the correct place
10 pt
10 pt
Literature Summary (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
within the reference; correct
punctuation
This criterion is linked to a
Learning
OutcomePublication
Information listed in correct
format
Volume (italicized); Issue;
Page #(s); correct
punctuation;
DOI provided and functional
Total Points: 100
10 pts
6 pts
0 pts
No more than 1 error
2 or more errors
No Marks
10 pt

Purchase answer to see full
attachment