Description
Just wanted to send to you to update and let me know the cost. If I could receive it back within 3 days. If you need me to resend the papers I will but for now Ill send the comments rec back for corrections.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
COM-20041 Project Rubric
Activity: Submit Your Project Here
Course: COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08
Name: Mary Dieterich-Callaway
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Describes your
complex challenge
and factors that
contribute to the
complexity of the
issue supported by
examples
Describes your
complex challenge and
factors that contribute
to the complexity of
the issue supported by
examples
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include explain how
different factors
interact to contribute
to the overall
complexity of the
challenge or providing
specific examples
Does not attempt to
describe a complex
challenge and factors
that contribute to the
complexity of the
issue
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
The work must be cited to add objectivity to the work.
Please provide a discussion that is fact-based (cite your work) and avoids generalizations or
your opinion.
9/10/23 – Mary, you have done a great job of introducing your topic.
You have a good start in analyzing your complex challenge; however, be sure to specifically
state what the challenge is supported by relevant research (don’t forget to provide in-text
citations). Please refer to the library resources and use your own words to convey the ideas
from sources. As it stands right now you have a good basis for pointing out the issue, however
it is opinion-based vs. fact-based due to the lack of supporting evidence. Additionally, be sure
to clearly state the specific factors that have contributed to the complexity of the issue in
order to meet this rubric criteria.
Although you have introduced the topic, more is needed to understand the complexity of the
issue. Who is most impacted by stressful work environments (i.e. leaders or employees)? Is
workplace stress more impactful based on specific industries or occupations?
Socioeconomic factors were part of your topic, so be sure to address this area. What
are socioeconomic factors and how does this impact stress? How does socioeconomics
influence how stress is managed and addressed? As you situate the topic, you must also
include research to support the topic. Without research, the information becomes opinion
based and does not support the magnitude of the problem. Project Resources: In the Unit
Resources under Your Research Challenge the article titled, “Choosing aTopic”, presents
overarching questions to guide the process of inquiry in research so you are deliberate with
your research question or the complex challenge you may be trying to solve. The website, “Ask
the Right Questions” provides strategies to explore when scoping your research and refining
your question. Review the article found under the Unit Resources: Research Methods and
Research Methodologies titled, “Four Primary Lenses” to examine the four primary lenses
commonly used by a variety of professionals in the field to help individuals in one profession
problem-solve more effectively, or apply new and innovative ways of addressing the problem
in their field.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
1/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Evaluates at least
seven primary or
Evaluates at least
seven primary or
Does not evaluate any
primary or secondary
secondary sources
secondary sources for
their relevance,
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include providing an
credibility
for their relevance,
validity, and
credibility
validity, and credibility
sources for their
relevance, validity, and
evaluation of all three
elements for at least
seven sources
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
Move this annotated bibliography to the section directly after the complex challenge. This
allows the reader to see the framework of the sources as soon as they read the challenge to
set up the rest of the paper.
9/10/23 – You are off to a good start here as well, however the annotated bibliography is
formatted in a very specific way.
Provide a heading entitled Annotated Bibliography
1. Double-check to ensure all of your sources support your challenge. Do you need to find
additional sources?
2. Make sure your reviews are not too detailed. The summary should be 1-2 paragraphs. You
have lot of extra information outside of the annotated bibliography section where you have
summarized the credibility and provided other explanations of the sources, however each
source should include their own explanation and not wrapped in together with other sources
that you have found.
3. The format for an annotated bibliography is very specific. You state the source prior to any
review/discussion. Please set your sources up to reflect this format. See this source below:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliogr
aphies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html
4. Clearly evaluate each of your sources against these five (5) criteria:
Authority: Authority refers to the credibility of the author or creator of the information.
A person with authority is an accepted expert in his/her field.
Accuracy: Accuracy refers to how factual the source is. An accurate source has reliable
references to back up its claims – references that can be verified.
Currency: What is current varies from subject to subject. Medical research relies on a
shorter time period for currency than literary or historical studies.
Relevance: Is the source really relevant to your topic? Does it strengthen your
argument? Some sources may only relate to your topic in a loose way, especially topics
with multiple subcategories.
Objectivity: The point of view and purpose of a source can help you determine how
objective a source is and how much bias plays a role
Please addressed the criteria, for every source in this section, and clearly state why it meets or
does not meet that criteria by asking these questions.
1. Are the authors an authority? Why or why not?
2. Is the information presented factual? Why or why not? How do you know?
3. Is the information current? Why or why not?
4. Is the source really relevant to your topic? Does it strengthen your argument?
5. Is the point of view objective?
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
2/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Includes research
sources that
Includes research
sources that
Shows progress
Does not include any
research sources
individually and
individually and
collectively are
appropriate to the
discipline subject or
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
in which challenge is
branch of knowledge
in which challenge is
sources relevant to
the subject area
situated
situated
collectively are
appropriate to the
discipline subject or
branch of knowledge
toward expectations,
improvement may
include selecting
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
The verb tense and tone is confusing.
In this section, you will discuss the methods used to analyze your topic.
As you were searching for sources, why did you determine that these methods were most
appropriate to analyzing your topic? Why were these methods appropriate to evaluating the
challenge?
Keep in mind that this this is not so much about your process, but more about the
research methods that you considered when you selected the sources to support your stance.
Provide just a paragraph or two that includes more context around your issue and a detailed
explanation that discusses the research methods of the supporting sources (qualitative,
quantitative, case studies, primary data, secondary data, etc.). In this explanation, inform on
the types of methods that were used, why they are relevant, credible, and how the sources
have used research to address your challenge.
9/10/23 – You should look specifically at the methods that are used in your research and
discuss how these methods help to examine the topic. For example, if you evaluate a survey or
study then consider the methods used and how it helps to understand the topic and the issue
more effectively. Is the research used more quantitative or qualitative in nature? How does
a qualitative or quantitative analysis help to examine the challenge. When you were selecting
sources for the topic, why did you feel these were the most appropriate to examine the
issue?
Consider adding a paragraph that includes more context around your issue and and a detailed
explanation that discusses the research methods of the supporting sources (qualitative,
quantitative, case studies, etc.). In this explanation, inform on the types of methods that were
used, why they are relevant, credible, and how the sources have used research to address your
challenge. This is not so much about your process, however more about how
the research methods that you considered when you selected the sources to support your
stance.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
3/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Proposes course of
Proposes specific
course of action or
Shows progress
toward expectations,
Does not propose any
course of action
actions that represent
a reasonable solution
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
to the complex
challenge supported
improvement may
include supporting the
by applicable
methods, tools,
technologies, or
necessary resources
from at least five of
the most appropriate
recommendation with
at least five sources
action that
represents a
reasonable solution
to the complex
challenge supported
by applicable
methods, tools,
technologies, or
necessary resources
from at least five
sources in the
annotated
bibliography
from the annotated
bibliography
sources in the
annotated
bibliography
Discusses the
research and how
your interpretation
supports your
recommendations
Discusses the research
and how your
interpretation
supports your
recommendations
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include discussing
how your
recommendations are
relevant, logical, and
directly linked to the
research findings
Does not attempt to
discuss the research
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23 As you incorporate rationale to support your recommendations, you will need to
summarize the research and discuss how it aligns to each of the five (5) courses of action.
Try starting a new paragraph that specifically uses the rubric item as a starter. For instance:
Based on the research found, X [source] supports my recommendation of______…Y [source]
indicated _____, which supports my recommendations of _______
For example, you may discuss a survey instrument that provides evidence for your
recommendations. In this case, you would explain the research and how it supports your
courses of action (i.e. A survey was conducted by Smith (2019) that showed xxxx, which
supports my recommendation of xxxx).
The information within your interpretation connects to your solution. Make sure that you go
further in explaining the specific elements of the research that aligns from the five sources
that support your recommendations.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
4/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Discusses the
Discusses the
significance and
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include addressing any
Does not attempt to
discuss the
significance and
limitations of the
research in
supporting your
recommendations
limitations of the
research in supporting
your
recommendations
significance and
limitations of the
research
limitations or potential
biases in the research
and assess their
impact on the
conclusions
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
A component of the significance of the study is to illustrate the contribution that your study
will make to the existing literature on the problem or broad problem areas of education.
This section is about the research that you found and reviewed. Since you cannot review every
piece of research, we are interested in the pros and cons of the research that you used.
Answer these questions to show the significance of the research:
who benefits from the study
how that specific audience will benefit from its findings.
what contribution will your study make to the literature or to the field?
The significance of the study’s purpose is to make clear why your study was needed and the
specific contribution your research made to furthering academic knowledge in your field.
No study is completely flawless or inclusive of all possible aspects. When
discussing limitations in research, explain how they impact your findings because creating
their short list or description isn’t enough.
Answer these questions to show the limitation of the research:
did the research not include an important sector (i.e. age, culture, industry)?
was the research limited (i.e. only 10 participants)?
what did you feel was missing in how the research was conducted overall?
if you had to conduct research, what adjustments would you make to the current
processes to strengthen the results?
Examples include: research design (constraints on your population); insufficient sample size,
time constraints, cultural bias, etc.
Remember that future research of a topic is built upon prior research. By highlighting
limitations, you suggest a possible path for future researchers.
The significance and limitations should reference the research, not the recommendations.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
5/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Defends the course
Defends the course of
action or actions you
of action or actions
you have
recommended over
the alternatives
based on relevant
methods, resources,
tools, and ethical
implications
have recommended
over the alternatives
based on relevant
methods, resources,
tools, and ethical
implications
Not Yet
Not Evident
Does not attempt to
defend the course of
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
action or actions
recommended
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include explaining why
the recommended
course of action is
superior to the
alternatives,
highlighting strengths
or how it addresses
the problem
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
This section is for you to draw conclusions about everything you discovered along the way as it
pertains to the research – not so much about your opinion.
Using the recommendations as your conclusion you will need to defend why your actions and
recommendations are the most suitable versus what you have found. Using in-text
citations, cite your work that justifies your position and avoid generalizations.
Be sure to address the WHY? Explain why these methods are better than other methods used
in research attempting to solve the same/similar issues? What research have you found that
would support this method making this the best choice over the alternatives?
Avoid generalizations and cite your work that justifies your position. Be sure to defend why
your actions and recommendations are the most suitable versus what you have found. This
means including in-text citations to support your position.
9/10/23 – Mary, you have added a lot of information in your conclusion as well and even have
information that does not really apply, for example, you have stated “The purpose of this
annotated bibliography is to present a range of perspectives on workplace
stress and its impact on individuals and organizations.” This is out of place.
This section is for you to draw conclusions about everything you discovered along the way as it
pertains to the research – not so much about your opinion. For instance address the WHY?
Based on what other methods found in research? WHY is this method better than other
methods used in research attempting to solve the same/similar issues? What research have
you found that would support this method making this the best choice over the alternatives?
Also, once you have addressed the interpretation and the significance/limitation rubric items
this area will develop more.
Please review the resources Reading: The Conclusion and Reading: Writing Commons, How to
Write a Compelling Conclusion to help guide you towards writing a strong conclusion that
shows your reflection on your research and what sums up what you’ve learned.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
6/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Consistently and
Consistently and
effectively
Shows progress
towards expectations,
Does not provide an
organized response
communicates in an
organized way
but communication is
inconsistent or
effectively
communicates in an
organized way
ineffective in a way
that negatively
impacts
understanding
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
We will review this once all revisions are made.
9/10/23 – It appears that the information in your brief has been rewritten using a tool that
helps to avoid plagiarism, as the words do not flow resulting in incoherent sentences. Please
make sure to use your words as the brief currently lacks cohesiveness which is presenting a
great deal of unclarity.
Uses citations for
areas requiring
attribution
Uses citations for
areas requiring
attribution, with minor
errors
Uses citations for
ideas requiring
attribution, but with
major omissions
Does not use citations
for ideas requiring
attribution
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
This research brief calls for two separate lists: the annotated bibliography found in the body of
the brief and the references list at the end of the brief.
The annotated bibliography should be the section that follows the complex challenge section.
That is because this annotated bibliography helps the reader understand as soon as possible
what you used to address your complex challenge and how reliable the information is.
The references page(s) follows at the end of the paper and lists that information that
references all sources used (author(s), date, publication, website link), including those from the
annotated bibliography but does not include a summary of the research.
There should be a minimum of 7 sources here – the same ones that are in the annotated
bibliography.
Use the same citing style that you use for all of your other projects.
1. It is necessary to include in-text citations in the body of the brief; the sources of these
citations should all be visible on the references page.
2. This list will then act as a guide and provide the information necessary for your reviewer
to locate and retrieve any source you cite in the body of the paper.
3. Each source you cite in the paper must appear in your reference list; likewise, each
entry in the reference list must be cited in your text. Remember, you cannot post just a
URL or website address as an in-text citation.
Please go to this link:
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1157169/viewContent/19873594/View
to address any requirements you may have for in-text citations and reference page to support
your references.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
7/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Rubric Criteria
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
We expect that many students use additional sources to support their work even though the
sources are not part of the annotated bibliography.
9/10/23 – Since there is additional writing and research to complete, this rubric item will be
reassessed during resubmission of your project. Please review your paper to ensure that you
have cited all directly quoted and/or paraphrased information and that all references
correspond to an appropriate in-text citation (including images and charts). The Citation Help
tile located in BrightSpace can help to determine when and how to cite your sources
appropriately. This resource includes access to the CfA Citation Guide and CfA Citation Maker,
which will help to cite your sources.
Overall Score
Mastered
Not Yet
This submission demonstrates mastery of
This submission needs improvement and does not yet demonstrate
this competency.
mastery of this competency.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
8/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
COM-20041 Project Rubric
Activity: Submit Your Project Here
Course: COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08
Name: Mary Dieterich-Callaway
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Describes your
complex challenge
and factors that
contribute to the
complexity of the
issue supported by
examples
Describes your
complex challenge and
factors that contribute
to the complexity of
the issue supported by
examples
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include explain how
different factors
interact to contribute
to the overall
complexity of the
challenge or providing
specific examples
Does not attempt to
describe a complex
challenge and factors
that contribute to the
complexity of the
issue
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
The work must be cited to add objectivity to the work.
Please provide a discussion that is fact-based (cite your work) and avoids generalizations or
your opinion.
9/10/23 – Mary, you have done a great job of introducing your topic.
You have a good start in analyzing your complex challenge; however, be sure to specifically
state what the challenge is supported by relevant research (don’t forget to provide in-text
citations). Please refer to the library resources and use your own words to convey the ideas
from sources. As it stands right now you have a good basis for pointing out the issue, however
it is opinion-based vs. fact-based due to the lack of supporting evidence. Additionally, be sure
to clearly state the specific factors that have contributed to the complexity of the issue in
order to meet this rubric criteria.
Although you have introduced the topic, more is needed to understand the complexity of the
issue. Who is most impacted by stressful work environments (i.e. leaders or employees)? Is
workplace stress more impactful based on specific industries or occupations?
Socioeconomic factors were part of your topic, so be sure to address this area. What
are socioeconomic factors and how does this impact stress? How does socioeconomics
influence how stress is managed and addressed? As you situate the topic, you must also
include research to support the topic. Without research, the information becomes opinion
based and does not support the magnitude of the problem. Project Resources: In the Unit
Resources under Your Research Challenge the article titled, “Choosing aTopic”, presents
overarching questions to guide the process of inquiry in research so you are deliberate with
your research question or the complex challenge you may be trying to solve. The website, “Ask
the Right Questions” provides strategies to explore when scoping your research and refining
your question. Review the article found under the Unit Resources: Research Methods and
Research Methodologies titled, “Four Primary Lenses” to examine the four primary lenses
commonly used by a variety of professionals in the field to help individuals in one profession
problem-solve more effectively, or apply new and innovative ways of addressing the problem
in their field.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
1/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Evaluates at least
seven primary or
Evaluates at least
seven primary or
Does not evaluate any
primary or secondary
secondary sources
secondary sources for
their relevance,
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include providing an
credibility
for their relevance,
validity, and
credibility
validity, and credibility
sources for their
relevance, validity, and
evaluation of all three
elements for at least
seven sources
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
Move this annotated bibliography to the section directly after the complex challenge. This
allows the reader to see the framework of the sources as soon as they read the challenge to
set up the rest of the paper.
9/10/23 – You are off to a good start here as well, however the annotated bibliography is
formatted in a very specific way.
Provide a heading entitled Annotated Bibliography
1. Double-check to ensure all of your sources support your challenge. Do you need to find
additional sources?
2. Make sure your reviews are not too detailed. The summary should be 1-2 paragraphs. You
have lot of extra information outside of the annotated bibliography section where you have
summarized the credibility and provided other explanations of the sources, however each
source should include their own explanation and not wrapped in together with other sources
that you have found.
3. The format for an annotated bibliography is very specific. You state the source prior to any
review/discussion. Please set your sources up to reflect this format. See this source below:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliogr
aphies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html
4. Clearly evaluate each of your sources against these five (5) criteria:
Authority: Authority refers to the credibility of the author or creator of the information.
A person with authority is an accepted expert in his/her field.
Accuracy: Accuracy refers to how factual the source is. An accurate source has reliable
references to back up its claims – references that can be verified.
Currency: What is current varies from subject to subject. Medical research relies on a
shorter time period for currency than literary or historical studies.
Relevance: Is the source really relevant to your topic? Does it strengthen your
argument? Some sources may only relate to your topic in a loose way, especially topics
with multiple subcategories.
Objectivity: The point of view and purpose of a source can help you determine how
objective a source is and how much bias plays a role
Please addressed the criteria, for every source in this section, and clearly state why it meets or
does not meet that criteria by asking these questions.
1. Are the authors an authority? Why or why not?
2. Is the information presented factual? Why or why not? How do you know?
3. Is the information current? Why or why not?
4. Is the source really relevant to your topic? Does it strengthen your argument?
5. Is the point of view objective?
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
2/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Includes research
sources that
Includes research
sources that
Shows progress
Does not include any
research sources
individually and
individually and
collectively are
appropriate to the
discipline subject or
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
in which challenge is
branch of knowledge
in which challenge is
sources relevant to
the subject area
situated
situated
collectively are
appropriate to the
discipline subject or
branch of knowledge
toward expectations,
improvement may
include selecting
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23
The verb tense and tone is confusing.
In this section, you will discuss the methods used to analyze your topic.
As you were searching for sources, why did you determine that these methods were most
appropriate to analyzing your topic? Why were these methods appropriate to evaluating the
challenge?
Keep in mind that this this is not so much about your process, but more about the
research methods that you considered when you selected the sources to support your stance.
Provide just a paragraph or two that includes more context around your issue and a detailed
explanation that discusses the research methods of the supporting sources (qualitative,
quantitative, case studies, primary data, secondary data, etc.). In this explanation, inform on
the types of methods that were used, why they are relevant, credible, and how the sources
have used research to address your challenge.
9/10/23 – You should look specifically at the methods that are used in your research and
discuss how these methods help to examine the topic. For example, if you evaluate a survey or
study then consider the methods used and how it helps to understand the topic and the issue
more effectively. Is the research used more quantitative or qualitative in nature? How does
a qualitative or quantitative analysis help to examine the challenge. When you were selecting
sources for the topic, why did you feel these were the most appropriate to examine the
issue?
Consider adding a paragraph that includes more context around your issue and and a detailed
explanation that discusses the research methods of the supporting sources (qualitative,
quantitative, case studies, etc.). In this explanation, inform on the types of methods that were
used, why they are relevant, credible, and how the sources have used research to address your
challenge. This is not so much about your process, however more about how
the research methods that you considered when you selected the sources to support your
stance.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?ou=1376789&db=2423136&grpid=0
3/8
9/19/23, 10:16 AM
Feedback for Submit Your Project Here – COM-20041-XH018 Address Complex Challenges 23DA08 – Southern New Hampshire …
Rubric Criteria
Mastered
Not Yet
Not Evident
Proposes course of
Proposes specific
course of action or
Shows progress
toward expectations,
Does not propose any
course of action
actions that represent
a reasonable solution
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
to the complex
challenge supported
improvement may
include supporting the
by applicable
methods, tools,
technologies, or
necessary resources
from at least five of
the most appropriate
recommendation with
at least five sources
action that
represents a
reasonable solution
to the complex
challenge supported
by applicable
methods, tools,
technologies, or
necessary resources
from at least five
sources in the
annotated
bibliography
from the annotated
bibliography
sources in the
annotated
bibliography
Discusses the
research and how
your interpretation
supports your
recommendations
Discusses the research
and how your
interpretation
supports your
recommendations
Shows progress
toward expectations,
but with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include discussing
how your
recommendations are
relevant, logical, and
directly linked to the
research findings
Does not attempt to
discuss the research
Criterion Feedback
9/19/23 As you incorporate rationale to support your recommendations, you will need to
summarize the research and discuss how it aligns to each of the five (5) courses of action.
Try starting a new paragraph that specifically uses the rubric item as a starter. For instance:
Based on the research found, X [source] supports my recommendation of______…Y [source]
indicated _____, which supports my recommendations of _______
For example, you may discuss a survey instrument that provides evidence for your
recommendations. In this case, you would explain the research and how it supports your
courses of action (i.e. A survey was conducted by Smith (2019) that showed xxxx, which
supports my recommendation of xxxx).
