Description
Your team case study analysis should contain the same components as the cases you have been exposed to throughout the semester:
1. The Story
2. Situational Awareness (facts of the case, good/bad features of the story)
3. Prudential Reasoning (moral agents’ perspective)
4. Court Decision or Input from an Ethics Committee (justification)
5. Ethical Reflection
The case does not have to be entirely original. However, I do not want a slight variation of an existing case either.
You will also be graded on a number of other elements including use of outside resources to support your team case study analysis assignment, level of engagement among team members, and quality of the final presentation.
Please Note: Only one person from the team will be submitting the final products (Both a MS Word document detailing the analysis (in the same manner as the Individual Case Study Analysis assignment), and a PowerPoint Presentation file which will be used for an online presentation)
Simple sentences Please.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
The Story
Situational Awareness
Prudential Reasoning
Ethical Reflection
Individual Case Study Analysis Assignment Grading Rubric
PHHE 435/535
Excellent
Good
Limited
8 – 10
5-7
2–4
The story provides
The story provides
The story Includes
specific and
general detail
limited detail,
comprehensive
demonstrating a
lacking a
details,
possible ethical
compelling ethical
demonstrating a
dilemma, that may
dilemma that
significant ethical
requires an ethical
would justify an
dilemma, that
analysis to resolve
ethical analysis to
requires an ethical
it.
resolve it.
analysis to resolve it.
Provides specific and Provides general
Provides facts, or,
comprehensive facts facts and good/bad
good/bad features,
and good/bad
features of the case but not both
features of the case
study
Provides
Lists the significant
Lists some but not
comprehensive
moral agents, with a all moral agents,
listing of all
general description
with insufficient
significant moral
of their perspective details
agents, as well as a
specific /
comprehensive
description of their
perspective
Includes Ethical
Includes Ethical
Includes Ethical
Reflection based on
Reflection,
Reflection section,
integration of course commenting on the offering minimal
material and
relevance of course comments and/or
understanding of its material in a general development
relevance to the
way
case study in a
clearly specific way
Poor
0-1
The story is generic,
with no ethical
dilemma presented.
Fails to provide facts
or good/bad features
of the case
Fails to list any moral
agents or their
perspective
Ethical Reflection
missing from the
case study analysis
Use of Outside Sources
Provides multiple
references that
clearly supports case
study analysis, cites
in appropriate APA
style
Provides multiple
references to
support case study
analysis, but does
not cite in APA style
Provides specific and
substantial
justification for
either having or not
having a Court
Decision or Ethics
Committee input
Level of Team
Provides substantial
Engagement/Interactivity and meaningful
contribution to
development of Case
Study, posts
comprehensively to
the Weekly Status
report both as an
assigned Status
Reporter and also as
a team member
Quality of Presentation
Provides substantial
and meaningful
contribution to the
preparation and
delivery of the Team
Case Study
Presentation,
responding
Provides general
justification of
either having or not
having a Court
Decision or Ethics
Committee input
Court Decision or Ethics
Committee Input
Provides
references, but
does not clearly
establish relevance
to case study
analysis, does not
cite in APA style
Provides minimal
justification for
either having or
not having a Court
Decision or Ethics
Committee input
Fails to reference and
cite outside sources
Provides general
contribution to
development of
Case study, makes
assigned posting to
the Weekly Status
Report, and also
consistently posts as
a team member
Provides minimal
contribution to
development of
Case Study
Analysis, assigned
posting to Weekly
Status Report, both
as a Status
Reporter and team
member
Provides thoughtful
contribution to the
preparation and
delivery of the Team
Case Study
presentation,
responds partially to
questions
Provides minimal
contribution in
preparing and
delivering the
Team PowerPoint
Presentation, and
responding to
questions
Offers little to no
exchange of ideas,
contact, or
contribution to the
development of the
Case Study Analysis,
fails to post to the
Weekly Status Report
as the assigned
Status Reporter of as
a team member
Makes little to no
contribution in
preparing and
delivery of the
Team Case Study
Analysis PowerPoint
presentation
Fails to mention any
court decision or
input from an Ethics
Committee, or
justification why it is
not necessary
completely to
questions
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
