Description
The assignment requires to follow the instructions and guidelines in the uploaded forms below and answer the questions as
Unformatted Attachment Preview
+
Assignment: Ge x
samuelmerritt.instructure.com/courses/2598220/assignments/23742817
N626 Theoretical Foundation > Assignments > Week 11: Group Assignment: Geriatric Case Study
Submit Assignment
FALL
Week 11: Group Assignment: Geriatric Case Study
е
Suncements
Due Nov 24 by 11:59pm
Points 25
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
abus
Bules
Discuss the Geriatric Case Study Worksheet with your group and come to a consensus on the question included
therein.
ignments
cussions
Submit 1 copy of the completed worksheet with your group-consensus answers by 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time) on
Sunday.
ades
ple
Enferences
Ellaborations
nopto Library
udent Resources
Week 11: Group Assignment: Geriatric Case Study
aculty Resources
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
ngoing Feedback
Analysis of
topic, and
logical
expression of
ideas
0.0 pts
No
Submission
5.0 pts
Exceeds
Excels in responding to
assignment. Interesting,
demonstrates
sophistication of thought.
Central idea/thesis is
clearly communicated,
worth developing, while
limited enough to be
manageable. Submission
recognizes some
complexity of its thesis:
may acknowledge its
contradictions,
qualifications, or limits
and follow out their
logical implications.
3.0 pts
Met
A solid submission,
responding
appropriately to
assignment. Clearly
states a
thesis/central idea
but may have minor
lapses in
development.
Begins to
acknowledge the
complexity of
central idea and the
possibility of other
points of view.
Shows careful
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Adequate but
weaker and less
effective, possibly
responding less well
to assignment.
Presents central idea
in general terms,
often depending on
platitudes or clichés.
Usually does not
adequately
acknowledge other
views. Shows basic
comprehension of
sources, perhaps
with lapses in
1.0 pts
Not Met
Does not have
a clear central
idea or does
not respond
appropriately
to the
assignment.
Thesis may be
too vague or
obvious to be
developed
effectively.
Submission
may not
demonstrate
understanding
Does not
respond to
the
assignment,
lacks a
thesis or
central
idea, and
may
neglect to
use sources
where
necessary
The
assignment
5.0 pts
e
pu
ion
NVNVT44012
FUPENAINE PROUXIN IN.
1.
1
1
!
.
2
1.
3
1
5
6
Geriatric Case Study Worksheet
Case Study #1
Mr. S is a 79-year-old with multiple medical problems, but primarily suffering from heart disease. He is
retaining fluid in his legs and feet, sometimes limiting his mobility. Mr. S has difficulty keeping his multiple
medications organized and taking them as prescribed. He lives with his daughter, who is balancing the
needs of her young family with her aging father. Mr. Shates burdening his daughter with his medical
problems and tries to help by assisting with some of the daily house chores. He seldom leaves the house,
as most of his friends have either moved away or have died. Most of the time he stays in his room to not get
in the way of his daughter.
Case Study #2
Mrs. Mis a 90-year-old woman and has been a resident of a long-term care community since her husband
died 8 years ago. Her health status is fair. She has DM2 (controlled by oral medication) and rheumatoid
arthritis. At the community center, she has her own apartment, which she maintains with minimal
assistance, receives one hot meal each day in a common dining room, and has access to a full range of
services, such as a beauty shop, recreational facilities, and a chapel. She is generally happy in this setting.
She has no immediate family nearby, and the cost of the facility was covered by a large, one-time gift from
her now deceased husband. Recently, she has become weaker and has had difficulty walking, attending
activities including meals, and doing some of her ADLs due to her RA.
Questions:
.
As the NP and primary care provider (PCP) for these two individuals, compare your delivery of care for
these two situations. Select a nursing theory or model for each case study, and apply their principles to
these case studies.
Describe how you would apply the biopsychosocial model (BPSM) to the healthcare management of
these patients. Make sure that you include the concepts of client, health, environment, and nursing.
As an advanced practice nurse, select and apply a behavioral change theory to manage these patients’
cases and situations.
Discuss some of the financial constraints in managing healthcare for the geriatric population.
What are some ethical challenges that could be encountered in caring for the geriatric population?
FWPHENAZNE PROLIXIN INJ.
ment Ge X
+
uelmerritt instructure.com/courses/2598220/assignments/23742817
rary
Week 11: Group Assignment: Geriatric Case Study
sources
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
ources
edback
5.0 pts
Exceeds
3.0 pts
Met
1.0 pts
Not Met
Analysis of
topic, and
logical
expression of
ideas
0.0 pts
No
Submission
Excels in responding to
assignment. Interesting,
demonstrates
sophistication of thought.
Central idea/thesis is
clearly communicated,
worth developing, while
limited enough to be
manageable. Submission
recognizes some
complexity of its thesis:
may acknowledge its
contradictions,
qualifications, or limits
and follow out their
logical implications.
Understands and
critically evaluates its
sources, appropriately
limits and defines terms.
Does not
respond to
the
assignment,
lacks a
thesis or
central
idea, and
A solid submission,
responding
appropriately to
assignment. Clearly
states a
thesis/central idea
but may have minor
lapses in
development
Begins to
acknowledge the
complexity of
central idea and the
possibility of other
points of view.
Shows careful
reading of sources
but may not
evaluate them
critically. Attempts
to define terms, not
always successfully
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Adequate but
weaker and less
effective, possibly
responding less well
to assignment.
Presents central idea
in general terms,
often depending on
platitudes or clichés.
Usually does not
adequately
acknowledge other
views. Shows basic
comprehension of
sources, perhaps
with lapses in
understanding. If it
defines terms, often
depends on
dictionary
definitions
Does not have
a clear central
Idea or does
not respond
appropriately
to the
assignment.
Thesis may be
too vague or
obvious to be
developed
effectively,
Submission
may not
demonstrate
understanding
of sources
5.0 pts
may
neglect to
use sources
where
necessary
The
assignment
is not
turned in
1
3.0 pts
Met
0.0 pts
No
Submission
Critical
Thinking
(Logical
Structure,
dear
purpose,
considers
audience,
transitions
between
Idea, are
clear, Ideas
5.0 pts
Exceeds
Uses a logical
structure
appropriate to
submission’s
subject, purpose
audience, thesis,
and displinary
field. Sophisticated
transitional
Shows a logical
progression of
ideas and uses
fairly
sophisticated
transitional
devices, e.
may move from
least to more
Important Idea,
Some logical
links may be
faulty, but each
paragraph
clearly relates
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Lists ideas or arrange
them randomly rather
than using any evident
logical structure, May use
transitions, but they are
likely to be sequential
(first, second, third) rather
than logic based. While
each paragraph may relate
to central idea, logic is not
always clear. Paragraphs
have topic sentences but
may be overly general, and
arrangement of sentences
within paragraphs may
1.0 pts
Not Met
Has random
organization,
lacking internal
paragraph
coherence and
using few or
Inappropriate
transitions,
Paragraphs may
lack topic
sentences or
main ideas or are
too general or too
specific to be
effective
No
appreciable
organization:
lacks
transitions
and
coherence,
The
assignment
is not turned
5.O pts
developed,
reader can
follow
progression
develop one idea
from the previous
one, or identify
their logical
relations. Guides
NVNVT44012
* PROUXIT.
Assignment: Ge X
+
samuelmemittinstructure.com/courses/2598220/ansignments/23742817
Evidence
1.0 pts
Not Met
0.0 pts
No
Submission
Depends on clichés
5.0 pts
3.0 pts
Exceeds Met
Begins to offer
evidence reasons to support
appropriately its points, perhaps
and
using varied kinds
effectively, of evidence. Begins
providing to interpret the
sufficient evidence and
evidence and explain connections
explanation between evidence
to convince, and main ideas. Its
Full Marks
examples bear
some relevance.
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Often uses generalizations
to support its points, May
use examples, but they may
be obvious or not relevant,
Often depends on
unsupported opinion or
personal experience or
assumes that evidence
speaks for itself and needs
no application to the point
being discussed. Often has
lapses in logic.
overgeneralizations
for support or
offers little
evidence of any
kind. May be
personal narrative
rather than essay,
or summary rather
than analysis.
5.0 pts
Uses
irrelevant
details or
lacks
supporting
evidence
entirely.
May be
unduly
brief. The
assignment
is not
turned in.
Language
1.0 pts
Not Mat
2.0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Uses relatively
vague and general
words, may use
0.0 pts
No
Submission
5.0 pts
Exceeds
Chooses words for their
precise meaning and
uses an appropriate
level of specificity,
Sentence style fits
assignment’s audience
and purpose, Sentences
are varied, yet clearly
structured and carefully
focused, not long and
rambling
Usually
contains
3.0 pts
Met
Generally uses
words accurately
and effectively, but
may sometimes be
too general,
Sentences
generally clear,
well structured
and focused,
though some may
be awkward or
ineffective,
Inappropriate
BBB
May be too vague
and abstract, or
Very prsonal
and specific
Usually contains
several awkward
or ungrammatical
sentences:
sentence
structure is
simple or
monotonous.
many
awkward
sentences.
5.0 pts
Sentence structure
generally correct,
but sentences may
be word
unfocused,
repetitive, or
confusing,
words,
employs
Inappropriate
language. The
assignment is
not turned in
Mechanics
such as
punctuation,
spelling and
grammatical
correctness
5.0 pts
Exceeds
Almost
entirely free
of spelling
punctuation,
and
grammatical
3.0 pts
Met
May containa
few errors,
which may
annoy the
2.0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Usually contains
several mechanical
errors, which may
temporarily
confuse the reader
but does not
Impede the overall
understanding
1.0 pts
Not Mat
Usually contains either
many mechanical errors
or a few important
errors that block the
reader’s understanding
and ability to see
connections between
thoughts
reader but not
impede
understanding
0.0 pts
No Submission
Contains so many
mechanical errors that
It is impossible for the
reader to follow the
thinking from
sentence to sentence,
The assignment is not
turned in
5.0 pts
NVNVT44C12
**** FOUAN
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
