Description
Post 1
My change project enlightened me to the complexity of designing and attempting to implement a large-scale coordinative effort in the benefit of a process improvement methodology that builds upon existing bodies of knowledge. I did not consider the incredible number of moving parts involved, but glad to have gone through the process. Previously, I was not aware of just how many facets of such an endeavor must be covered in terms of a combination of clinically appropriate approaches, mechanisms to ensure equity, and the understanding that there is a lot of bridging between the actual patient and the proposed change of practices. I increased my awareness through the utilization of frameworks, which is my favorite methodology of addressing needs and research. Montano (2020) discusses the utilization of the Neuman systems model for various applications, specifically the use for APRN led interprofessional efforts and delineates methodologies for the utilization of theoretical frameworks as the basic recipe or do to list behind any complex action. The use of this method simplifies any process, or at the very least manages to break it down sufficiently enough where important details are less likely to be left out. In the same token I adopted these methodologies to tackle and keep track of any necessary actions and ascertain the needs of not only the patient, but also the project’s processes.
In terms of current practices, the process of learning and developing this change project gave me much to work with when engaging in administrative functions that require massive amounts of coordination. The understanding of an effective means of communicating with individuals from other disciplines in the purpose of coordinating complex patient care functions makes for a vast difference. To me, this means that when there is a well-developed method of implementing any complex methodology that involves patient care, the outcomes associated with the presence of protocols creates a unified means of addressing needs, coupled with the use of a strong theoretical framework, the protocols also cover variables to ensure all needs are indeed covered.
Referece:
Montano, A.-R. (2020). Neuman systems model with nurse-led Interprofessional Collaborative Practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318420965219
Post 2
The change project allowed me to recognize the critical importance of addressing issues related to insufficient patient education and inadequate time management, particularly in urgent care and primary care settings. It highlighted the impact of these issues on patient outcomes and satisfaction, emphasizing the need for patient-centered care.
Through the project, I learned that time management strategies can significantly enhance patient-provider interactions, leading to better patient understanding and trust. Moreover, providing cost-effective printed educational materials can bridge knowledge gaps among diverse patient populations, contributing to improved health outcomes (Harris et al., 2018).
My self-awareness of the values and attitudes influencing the role of an APRN in clinical practice has been heightened. I have come to appreciate the value of patient-centered care and the role of education in improving patient outcomes. Additionally, I’ve recognized the importance of advocating for adequate resources to support patient education and enhance time management in healthcare settings.
My classmates’ presentations provided valuable insights into different aspects of healthcare change projects. It was enlightening to see the diverse approaches and interventions employed to address various healthcare challenges. These presentations reinforced the idea of patient-centered care.
The foundations of my past and current knowledge have been reinforced through this project. I’ve gained a deeper understanding of the significance of time management in patient care and how education can bridge knowledge gaps. This knowledge will enhance my practice processes and contribute to better patient outcomes.
The change project has strengthened my understanding of developing and evaluating interventions that promote population health and prevent disease in community settings. It highlighted the need for personalized and culturally sensitive approaches to patient education, reinforcing the importance of considering diverse patient demographics and characteristics in healthcare interventions (Harris et al., 2018).
In conclusion, the change project has been an eye-opening experience that emphasized the critical role of addressing insufficient patient education and time management in healthcare. It has increased my self-awareness of the values and attitudes influencing my role as an APRN, reinforced my knowledge, and provided valuable insights from my peers’ projects. This project has deepened my understanding of the importance of patient-centered care and the significance of education in improving patient outcomes.
Reference
Harris, J. L., Roussel, L. A., Dearman, C., & Thomas, P. L. (2018). Project Planning and Management: A Guide for Nurses and Interprofessional Teams: A Guide for Nurses and Interprofessional Teams. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
