Description
Section II: Middle-Range Theories Ready for Application
1) Please choose any nursing theorist that is presented in this course as a group.(Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness)
2) Presentation must be 6 slides in total and include audio on all slides.
Address the information below for the PowerPoint Presentation and ensure that you follow the grading rubric below.
Title Slide (Title, You Name, School Name, Course Number and Name, Professor Name, Date)
Introduction of the Nursing Theorist (Select any theorist from this course)
Classification of the theory (Grand Theory, Middle Range, Practice Level, etc.)
References
The paper is to be a five to six (5-6) pages total excluding title page & reference pages (double-spaced, 12 font, 1-inch margins).Follow APA guidelines for a cover sheet, headers, pagination, references, etc.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Rubric for Collaborative Presentation – In-Class or Online (with Oral Delivery)
Criteria
Presentation/
Content
(Group grade)
Unsatisfactory-Beginning
0-34 points
Presentation content shows a lack of
understanding of the topic. There is
inadequate evidence of research and
insufficient relevant information and
facts. Content is confusing and/or
contains frequent inaccuracies.
Required elements are missing and/or
randomly organized. Sources, if
included, generally lack proper citation
format (APA 7th ed.).
Presentation/
Design
(Group grade)
0-18 points
Slides generally lack visual appeal and
are text-heavy with little or no visuals
and/or exhibit an overuse of color or
animations. Media, (e.g., images), if
used, are rarely cited on each slide. No
theme is evident and the presentation
appears disjointed rather than unified
and/or frequent errors (grammar,
punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.)
on the slides
Presentation/
Oral Delivery
(Group grade)
0-10 points
Ineffective in delivering the oral
presentation demonstrating below
average/poor communication skills.
Substantially over/under the time limit
to present and/or not all members
presented. Lack of preparation was
evident.
Presentation/
Notes/
Transcript
(Group grade
0-4 points
Presentation lacks “Notes” on slides (or
in a separate document) to explain
each slide and/or, if included, the
notes repeat the text provided on the
slide. Writing demonstrates a below
average/poor writing style with
frequent errors in spelling, grammar,
punctuation, and/or usage.
Developing
35-39 points
Presentation content shows
general understanding of the topic.
There is limited evidence of
research in locating relevant
information and facts and/or
supporting statements made.
Content contains some
inaccuracies, inconsistencies,
misinterpretations, and/or
somewhat unclear. A required
element may be missing and/or
some sources may be improperly
cited (APA 7th ed.).
19 points
Slides generally include a mix of
white space, visuals, and/or text
but not consistently and/or some
overuse or inappropriate use of
color or animations. Theme (e.g.,
template) is not consistently
evident throughout the
presentation and/or some errors
(grammar, punctuation, spelling,
formatting, etc.) on the slides.
Accomplished
40-44 points
Presentation content shows an
adequate understanding of the topic.
Some research effort is evident in
locating relevant information and
facts. Content is mostly accurate and
reasonably organized. May contain
some inconsistencies in content or
some connections made may not be
supported. Required elements are
included and sources are properly
cited (APA 7th ed.) for the most part.
Exemplary
45-50 points
Presentation content shows a
thorough understanding of the
topic. Substantive research effort is
evident in locating relevant
information and facts. Content is
accurate and sequenced in a clear,
logical way. All required elements
are included and sources are
properly cited (APA 7th ed.).
Total
/50
20-22 points
Slides are effectively designed with
visual appeal including white space,
visuals, and minimal text for the most
part. Color and animations are used
appropriately. Theme (e.g., template)
is evident in the presentation for the
most part to produce a cohesive
presentation and/or minor errors
(grammar, punctuation, spelling,
formatting, etc.) on the slides.
/25
11 points
Somewhat effective in delivering
the oral presentation
demonstrating average
communication skills. Slightly
over/under the time limit. Some
members presented more than
others. More preparation was
needed.
5 points
Minimal “Notes” are included in
the presentation slides (or in a
separate document) and/or are
sporadically provided. Writing
demonstrates an average writing
style with some errors in spelling,
grammar, punctuation, and/or
usage.
12-13 points
Effective in delivering the oral
presentation demonstrating good
communication skills and generally
close to the time limit for the group
to present (20 minutes total). All
group members presented and
preparation was evident for the most
part.
7 points
“Notes” are included in the
presentation (or in a separate
document) for the most part to
explain slides as a written transcript.
Writing demonstrates an above
average writing style with little
grammar, punctuation, spelling, and
or usage errors.
23-25 points
Slides are visually well designed,
aesthetically pleasing with
appropriate use of white space,
visuals, and minimal text, on each
slide. Color and animations are used
judiciously. Theme (e.g., template) is
evident throughout to produce a
highly cohesive presentation.
Basically free from errors (grammar,
punctuation, spelling, formatting,
etc.) on the slides.
14-15 points
Highly effective in delivering a wellpolished oral presentation within
the time limit for the group to
present (20 minutes total). All group
members presented equally.
Preparation was strongly evident.
8-10 points
“Notes” are included in the
presentation (or in a separate
document) to fully explain each slide
as a written transcript. Writing
demonstrates a strong writing style
basically free from grammar,
punctuation, spelling, or usage
errors.
/15
/10
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
