Description
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.
Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.
In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.
To Prepare:
Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.
Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.
Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.
The Assignment:
Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
Your topic of interest.
A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template
Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research
NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsing the Week 3 Part 3, section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template complete Step 1. Conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· The topic of interest you have selected. · Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details. · Identify one or more professional practice uses of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details. … The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response partially identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details. … The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected. … The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. 17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template for:Strengths of the ResearchLimitations of the ResearchRelevancy to the Topic of Interest. · Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice. 15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. … The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice. 13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template or is missing. … The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice or is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3, Step 2: Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following: · Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. · Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
45 to >40.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research. 40 to >35.0 ptsGoodThe response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response partially identifies and describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research. 35 to >31.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies describes in detail at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research. 31 to >0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research or is missing. … The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies describes in detail or is missing at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. 2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library researchLinks to an external site.. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instruc..
Here’s my previous discussion just in case it comes in handy
Cummings et al (2021) article, “The Essentials of nursing leadership: A systematic review of factors and educational interventions influencing nursing leadership,” is the peer-reviewed source I selected that is of particular interest to me. I used the ScienceDirect database to search for this article because it is a reliable source for the life and physical sciences, medicine, technical fields, and, most importantly, nursing-related research. However, several challenges were encountered during the search process. Initially, there was difficulty in selecting appropriate keywords, leading to some trial and error before settling on ” The essentials of nursing leadership” as the most relevant terms. Furthermore, the search generated an overwhelming number of results, necessitating the use of filters and sorting options to refine the outcomes effectively. Lastly, ensuring full-text access to the identified article proved essential, as some articles were restricted behind paywalls, emphasizing the importance of accessing complete research materials.UsefulnessDespite these difficulties, the ScienceDirect database would be useful to my colleagues. This expansive database predominantly centers on biomedical and healthcare literature, encompassing a wide array of peer-reviewed articles (Figueiredo & Pereira, 2017). It is an invaluable resource for healthcare professionals, including nurses, granting them access to a diverse range of research on topics pertinent to nursing practice, patient care, and healthcare management.RecommendationI recommend using ScienceDirect as a primary database for healthcare professionals and researchers. ScienceDirect’s user-friendly interface grants users access to a substantial repository of top-notch peer-reviewed articles (Harnegie, 2013). Furthermore, this database boasts advanced search features, filters, and tools that facilitate precise and efficient searches, making it particularly advantageous when seeking specific topics or refining search results. In summary, ScienceDirect is a dependable and all-encompassing resource for those engaged in evidence-based practice and scholarly research within the healthcare sector.
********I HAVE ALSO PROVIDED MY PREVIOUS PAPERS JUST IN CASE YOU NEED TO USE THEM********
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1
Part 2: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
Aram Megrabian
Walden University
NURS 6003N
Carie Braun
September 10, 2023
2
Part 2: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
Section 1: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity
Academic Integrity and Writing
Academic integrity is the foundation of ethical scholarship and crucial to higher
education, especially in my MSN program. It pledges academic honesty, fairness, and
trustworthiness. A key component in Academic integrity necessitates avoiding plagiarism.
Academically, plagiarism involves using someone else’s ideas, words, or work without credit.
This can be disastrous and significantly lower the academic reputation of individuals (Ansorge et
al., 2021). Student writing in my MSN program is influenced by academic honesty. It requires
me to write original content, properly reference sources in APA format, and thank authors for
their efforts. Following these standards protects others’ intellectual property and guarantees that
my work accurately reflects my expertise and research. Writing with integrity emphasizes ethical
scholarship and fosters academic trust and respect.
Professional Practices and Scholarly Ethics
Academic ethics and nursing practice are deeply intertwined. Ethical principles govern all
patient care in nursing. These principles include beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and
justice. A high ethical standard in nursing is essential for secure and humane patient care.
Scholarly ethics and professional practices are interdependent. These ethical values are crucial to
my academic experience as a nursing student. The ethical frameworks I learned in school help
me make ethical nursing judgments. My academic ethical reasoning skills will help me make
decisions that emphasize patient well-being and respect scholarly ethics in a complex healthcare
setting.
3
Grammarly and Turnitin
Grammarly and Turnitin are crucial to academic honesty and writing quality. Grammarly
helps writers correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Grammarly improves my
academic writing by making it clear, concise, and error-free. On the contrary, Turnitin is a
powerful plagiarism detector. Checking my work against a huge academic database helps
students like me avoid accidental plagiarism (Sorea et al., 2021). I can avoid plagiarism and
promote academic honesty by utilizing Turnitin to cite and reference all sources properly.
Grammarly and Turnitin protect academic integrity by promoting ethical writing and providing
feedback and coaching to improve my academic work.
Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
Academic Work as an MSN Student
As an MSN student, I will use numerous methods to ensure academic integrity. Time
management comes first. I must manage my time well to avoid last-minute rushes and academic
dishonesty (Goldsby et al., 2020). Also, planning my schedule will help me avoid plagiarism by
arranging my study schedule and making realistic goals to finish projects early. Additionally, I
will actively engage with my lecturers and peers. Open communication with lecturers lets me ask
questions and clarify assignment expectations. Working with classmates on group projects
improves my teamwork abilities and holds us accountable for academic integrity. Finally, I will
utilize the university’s writing center and library databases to guarantee my research and writing
follow academic standards and ethics.
Professional Work as a Nurse
4
Integrity in professional activities is essential as I enter my nursing career. One way to
solidify my professional activity is by pursuing ethical education. This requires keeping up with
healthcare ethics advancements, including regulations and norms. I will attend ethics conferences
and seminars and study nursing ethics journal articles to ensure my professional behaviors are
ethical. Secondly, ethical nursing requires patient autonomy, confidentiality, and patient-centered
care (Molina-Mula & Gallo-Estrada, 2022). To follow these ideals, I will actively engage with
patients to help them understand their treatment options and make educated decisions. I will also
strictly follow patient confidentiality guidelines because trust is the core of the nurse-patient
interaction. I will also seek guidance from experienced nurses with a good ethical record.
Learning from their real-world experiences and ethical problems will shape my nursing ethics.
5
References
Ansorge, L., Ansorgeová, K., & Sixsmith, M. (2021). Plagiarism through paraphrasing tools—
The story of one plagiarized text. Publications, 9(4),
48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9040048
Goldsby, E., Goldsby, M., Neck, C. B., & Neck, C. P. (2020). Under pressure: Time
management, self-leadership, and the nurse manager. Administrative Sciences, 10(3),
38. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030038
Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of
care and patient autonomy in decision-making. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 17(3), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030835
Sorea, D., Roșculeț, G., & Bolborici, A. (2021). Readymade solutions and students’ appetite for
plagiarism as challenges for online learning. Sustainability, 13(7),
3861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073861
1
Building an Effective Academic and Professional Network for MSN Success
2
Building an Effective Academic and Professional Network for MSN Success
Academic and Professional Network
As I embark on my journey in the MSN program and toward becoming a practicing
nurse, I recognize the importance of building a robust academic and professional network. This
network will be vital in shaping my success and guiding me throughout my educational and
career endeavors. I have identified key individuals and teams within both Walden University and
the nursing profession who will contribute to my achievements:
Academic Connections
Dr. Emily Johnson (Associate Professor, Walden University School of Nursing): Dr.
Johnson’s expertise in advanced nursing concepts aligns well with my academic goals. Her
research interests in evidence-based practice and patient outcomes resonate with my aspirations.
Collaborating with her will provide insights into current research trends and methodologies,
enriching my understanding of nursing practices.
Research and Writing Center: The Research and Writing Center at Walden University
will be an essential academic resource. Their assistance in developing vital research and writing
skills will be crucial for my coursework and for contributing to the nursing field through
scholarly articles and research projects.
Professional Connections
Dr. John Doe (Seasoned Nursing Mentor): Drawing from Dr. Doe’s rich background in
the nursing realm, particularly within my specialized field, I anticipate gaining invaluable
wisdom and practical viewpoints. His mentorship will serve as a compass during my evolution
3
from a student to an active nurse, effectively closing the divide between theoretical learning and
practical application.
Nursing Networking Group: Joining a professional nursing networking group through
local chapters or online platforms will connect me with a diverse community of nurses. Engaging
in discussions, attending events, and sharing experiences with fellow professionals will enhance
my knowledge, expose me to different nursing specialties, and provide opportunities for
collaboration.
Rationale for Selection
I chose these individuals and resources based on their expertise, relevance to my
academic and professional goals, and their potential to offer guidance and support. Dr. Johnson’s
and the Research and Writing Center will aid me in excelling academically, ensuring I produce
high-quality work. Dr. Doe and the nursing networking group will provide real-world
perspectives, advice, and opportunities for growth as I transition into the nursing profession.
By collaborating with these academic and professional connections, I am confident I will
not be alone. As Donne emphasized, “No man is an island,” Through these networks, I will have
the support and guidance necessary to succeed in my MSN program and thrive as a competent
and compassionate practicing nurse.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
