Description
I uploaded the patient case and Cmap. You need to use them to make power point slides
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Case presentations for Rec 1 – Group and Individual evaluations
Group #_____________ Date _____________ Case# _________
Scoring: 3. below expectation = material poorly linked to Cmap or just reading the presentation;
7. Meets expectation = relates content to Cmap, does not just read content, proper depth and
length, coordinated with other team members; 10. Exceeds expectation = strongly connects
content to Cmap, explains material at a high level, coordinated with other team members, does
not need to read material and able to answer audience questions thoughtfully.
Individual scores:
Student Name
Parts of
Case/Cmap
presented
Appropriate
time
management
(Y/N)
Case introduced
clearly with
subjective and
objective
findings on
Cmap
Cmap section
presented linked
clearly to Cmap
Assessment
physiology and
pharmacology
components
well explained
and clearly
linked to Cmap
Presentation
content and
flow clearly
shows
coordination
with other group
members
Maximum points for this section = 60
Group/Team score:
Group #_____________ Date _____________ Case# _________
Cmap is thoughtful
and easy to read
3=missing important components or connections
7=all components are present
10=components are present and clearly linked to presentation
Cmap has all
components and
connections as
outlined in Cmap
lecture
Team presentation
shows obvious
coordination of
content among group
3=components missing so connections missing
7=connections are present for components, not clearly linear thought
10= clear and thoughtful connections useful in presntation
All team members
have comparable
parts in presentation
3=any team members has little part eg. Just presents case
components not requiring research or thought
7=all team members present at least part of the assessment and plan
components
10=all team members coordinated to provide equal in-depth
components of the assessment and plan.
Able to field
questions related to
Cmap and
presentation
3=no team members can answer basic questions from audience
7=at least one team member is able to answer audience questions
10=all team members show ability to answer questions related to
their part of presentation
Max for this section = 50
3=coordination is not apparent, obvious team members just worked
on separate sections.
7=members are coordinated in their presentation
10=members enhance each others presentations by reinforcing parts
others presented
Group/Team score re question quality:
Group #_____________ Date _____________ Case# _________
Student
Question asked
uses 4 option
multiple choice
format or
calculation style
format.
3=no, 10=yes
Question
includes 4
appropriate
choices
3=no, 10=yes
Question added
educational
content reflectin
physiology,
pharmacology,
or pharm
practice lab.
3=no, 10=yes
Question answer
explained
properly to class
3=no, 10=yes
Allows audience
time to answer
question.
3=no, 10=yes
Maximum points for this section = 50
Student group SOAP note well organized and reflective of case discussion and Cmap:
5=not organized or incorrect, 15=good and appropriate, 20= excellent
References are correctly formatted:
5=>50% incorrect, 15=
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
