Description
Discussion: Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues You will begin this Discussion by identifying a practice issue that will be your frame of reference as you analyze the theoretical basis of nursing practice. Be aware that your choice can potentially carry through the course, as you will continue to address this issue in the context of other types of theories in Week 3. This practice issue can also be one focus of your Module 3 exploration of evidence-based practice and quality improvement, and your Module 4 investigation of a critical practice question. Consequently, as you prepare for this Discussion, think carefully about your example for connecting middle range nursing theories to patient care. To prepare: Addressed each of the bullets below with a subtopic, all the references used must have an in-text citation in each paragraph. All Articles MUST BE PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES THAT MUST BE USED AND should come from USA and must be within last four years only that is from 2017 to 2021. Please do not begin a paragraph with author name(s) (PLEASE USE parenthetical/in-text citations APA format and 7 edition) Analyze your nursing practice for issues of particular interest or concern to you. Identify one issue as the focus of your application of theory to practice.( one of my practice issues in my work place as a nurse practitioner I am interested in improving the Hispanic population age 35 and above with Type II Diabetes through Self-Management Education.) SUCH AS; 1.Maintain a healthy weight. 2., Exercise regularly) MUST BE USED AS MY TOPIC OF INTEREST) Identify specific middle range theories that may apply to your practice issue and explain why. Be specific and provide examples. (1. JEAN WATSON ‘s theory OF HUMAN CARING, 2. Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Theory; MUST BE USED TO ADDRESS MY TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS IN HISPANIC POPULATION) Consider how to frame your focus practice issue in terms of the middle range theories(WHICH ARE THE WATSON THEORY AND OREM’S THEORY) that you have selected. FOUR ARTICLES WILL BE DOWNLOADED TO YOUR WEBSITES WHICH THEIR REFERENCES ARE BELOW THAT MUST BE USED TO ASK THE ABOVE QUESTIONS. Thank you References Townsend, C. A. (2020). Concept Analysis of Caring: Jean Watson Philosophy and Science of Caring. Nebraska Nurse, 53(2), 14–15. https://web-a-ebscohost-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org… Holly Wei, Fazzone, P. A., Sitzman, K., & Hardin, S. R. (2019). The Current Intervention Studies Based on Watson’s Theory of Human Caring: A Systematic Review. International Journal for Human Caring, 23(1), 4–22. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.20467/1091-5710.23.1.4 Gumbs, J. (2020). Orem’s Select Basic Conditioning Factors and Health Promoting Self-Care Behavior https://web-a-ebscohostcom.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/… among African American Women with Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 27(2), 47–52. Kline, K. N., Montealegre, J. R., Rustveld, L. O., Glover, T. L., Chauca, G., Reed, B. C., & Jibaja-Weiss, M. L. (2016). Incorporating Cultural Sensitivity into Interactive Entertainment-Education for Diabetes Self-Management Designed for Hispanic Audiences. Journal of Health Communication, 21(6), 658–668. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1153758
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Discussion: Exploring Middle Range Theories and Framing Practice Issues
You will begin this Discussion by identifying a practice issue that will be your frame of reference as you
analyze the theoretical basis of nursing practice. Be aware that your choice can potentially carry through
the course, as you will continue to address this issue in the context of other types of theories in Week 3.
This practice issue can also be one focus of your Module 3 exploration of evidence-based practice and
quality improvement, and your Module 4 investigation of a critical practice question. Consequently, as
you prepare for this Discussion, think carefully about your example for connecting middle range nursing
theories to patient care.
To prepare: Addressed each of the bullets below with a subtopic, all the references used must have
an in-text citation in each paragraph. All Articles MUST BE PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES THAT MUST BE
USED AND should come from USA and must be within last four years only that is from 2017 to 2021.
Please do not begin a paragraph with author name(s) (PLEASE USE parenthetical/in-text citations APA
format and 7 edition)
•
Analyze your nursing practice for issues of particular interest or concern to you. Identify one
issue as the focus of your application of theory to practice.( one of my practice issues in my
work place as a nurse practitioner I am interested in improving the Hispanic population age 35
and above with Type II Diabetes through Self-Management Education.) SUCH AS; 1.Maintain a
healthy weight. 2., Exercise regularly) MUST BE USED AS MY TOPIC OF INTEREST)
•
Identify specific middle range theories that may apply to your practice issue and explain why. Be
specific and provide examples. (1. JEAN WATSON ‘s theory OF HUMAN CARING, 2. Orem’s SelfCare Deficit Theory; MUST BE USED TO ADDRESS MY TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS IN HISPANIC
POPULATION)
•
Consider how to frame your focus practice issue in terms of the middle range theories(WHICH
ARE THE WATSON THEORY AND OREM’S THEORY) that you have selected.
FOUR ARTICLES WILL BE DOWNLOADED TO YOUR WEBSITES WHICH THEIR REFERENCES ARE BELOW
THAT MUST BE USED TO ASK THE ABOVE QUESTIONS. Thank you
References
Townsend, C. A. (2020). Concept Analysis of Caring: Jean Watson Philosophy and Science of
Caring. Nebraska Nurse, 53(2), 14–15. https://web-a-ebscohostcom.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=10&sid=447dbe13-09e1-4e86-90da09a12a3eafc5%40sessionmgr4007
Holly Wei, Fazzone, P. A., Sitzman, K., & Hardin, S. R. (2019). The Current Intervention Studies Based on
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring: A Systematic Review. International Journal for Human Caring, 23(1),
4–22. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.20467/1091-5710.23.1.4
Gumbs, J. (2020). Orem’s Select Basic Conditioning Factors and Health Promoting Self-Care Behavior
https://web-aebscohostcom.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=16&sid=447dbe13-09e1-4e8690da-09a12a3eafc5%40sessionmgr4007s among African American Women with Type 2
Diabetes. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 27(2), 47–52.
Kline, K. N., Montealegre, J. R., Rustveld, L. O., Glover, T. L., Chauca, G., Reed, B. C., & Jibaja-Weiss, M. L.
(2016). Incorporating Cultural Sensitivity into Interactive Entertainment-Education for Diabetes SelfManagement Designed for Hispanic Audiences. Journal of Health Communication, 21(6), 658–668.
https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1153758
ID:ti0005ID:p0075ID:p0080ID:ti0015ID:p0085ID:p0090
The Current Intervention Studies
Based on Watson’s Theory of
Human Caring: A Systematic
Review
Holly Wei, PhD, RN
Patricia Anne Fazzone, DNSc, MPH, RN
Kathleen Sitzman, PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN
Sonya Renae Hardin, PhD, RN, NP-C, FAAN
College of Nursing, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
Abstract: This article reviewed 19 intervention studies based on Watson’s Human Caring Theory between January 2005 and February 2018. The studies reviewed targeted on
promoting patients’, nurses’, and nursing students’ psychological health and patient care
experiences. Most (15/19; 78.95%) of the studies in this review indicated that Watson’s
caring science-based interventions could decrease patients’ emotional strains, increase
patients’ self-management confidence and emotional well-being, increase nurses’ job satisfaction and engagement, and improve nursing students’ confidence in the clinical performance and the awareness of caring behaviors. Nursing is a discipline that requires both
scientific knowledge and the art of human caring.
Keywords: Watson’s Human Caring Theory; caring science; intervention study; nursing; healthcare
Introduction
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring is a caring
science approach used to guide nursing practice, education, and research. Published in 1979,
Watson’s Theory of Human Caring (Watson,
1979) has planted a seed for postmodern nurse
caring and philosophy. Watson’s caring science
approach is meant to transform patient care from
a treatment-centered repair to a holistic mind–
body–spirit healing perspective (Sitzman & Watson, 2013; Watson, 2012). Healthcare organizations
and researchers have used Watson’s Theory of
Human Caring to guide their practice and interventions. Smith (2004) conducted a “Review of
research related to Watson’s Theory of Caring” in
2004. Since then, no systematic reviews on this
topic have been done.
An updated review of the literature about the
current interventional research projects based on
Watson’s Caring Theory is needed to meet the
gap. This article will provide an overview of the
intervention studies based on Watson’s Caring
Theory and help nurse clinicians, educators, and
researchers better understand the trend of caringbased research interventions, the effectiveness of
Pdf_Folio:4
4
International Journal for Human Caring, Volume 23, Number 1, 2019 © 2019 International Association for Human Caring
http://dx.doi.org/10.20467/1091-5710.23.1.4
ID:ti0020ID:ti0025ID:p0095ID:ti0030ID:p0100-p655ID:p0100ID:p0110ID:p0115ID:ti0040ID:p0125ID:ti0045ID:p0425ID:p0430
implementing Watson’s Human Caring Theory
principles, and the need for future knowledge
development. Therefore, the aim of this systematic
review is threefold: (a) to provide an overview of
published intervention studies based on Watson’s
Human Caring Theory between January 2005 and
February 2018; (b) to summarize the efficacy of the
interventions; and (c) to discuss the applicability
of the findings to nursing practice, education, and
research.
Methods
Design
This is a systematic review of the literature about
the current intervention studies based on Watson’s
Theory of Human Caring.
Search Methods
The search for this review followed the Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guideline (Moher et al., 2009).
The first author worked closely with a research
librarian from the same university to ensure the
accuracy of the search process. The search process
included: (a) setting the purpose and the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review; (b) selecting the databases and key terms for the search; (c)
conducting an initial search using the key terms
selected; (d) removing duplicates using a built-in
filter system of the university library databases; (e)
performing an initial screening based on the titles
and abstracts of the articles searched; (f) reading
the full-text of the remaining articles to do a final
screening based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria; and (g) searching for additional articles from
the reference list of the articles selected.
The databases used for the search included
MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE
Complete, and PsycINFO. Search terms were a
combination of the following keywords and MeSH
terms: ”Watson’s Human Caring Theory” or ”Watson’s Theory of Human Caring,” ”intervention,”
and ”nurs*” for ”nurse,” ”nurses,” or ”nursing.”
The search query in PubMed included Watson
Human Caring Theory [Title/Abstract] OR Watson Theory of Human Caring [Title/Abstract]
AND Intervention [Title/Abstract] OR Strateg*
[Title/Abstract] OR best practices [Title/Abstract]
AND Nurs*. “Strateg*” denoted strategy or strategies. “Nurs*” was used to identify nurse, nurses, or
nursing. In PubMed, search terms can be searched
in both article titles and abstracts at the same time.
Pdf_Folio:2
Review of Caring Interventions
The search query for CINAHL, MEDLINE
Complete, and PsycINFO included TI [titles] Watson’s Theory of Caring OR TI Watson’s Caring Theory AND TI nurse OR TI nurses OR TI nursing
AND TI (interventions or strategies or best practices). The search query was repeated to search the
keys terms in abstracts (AB): AB [abstract] Watson’s Theory of Caring OR AB Watson’s Caring
Theory AND AB nurse OR AB nurses OR AB nursing AND AB (interventions or strategies or best
practices).
The inclusion criteria were that articles were
intervention studies based on Watson’s Human
Caring Theory, evaluated by outcome measures,
and published in English between January 2005
and February 2018. Articles were excluded if outcomes were not evaluated after caring interventions or case studies. The literature search was set
to recognize the search terms in titles or abstracts
of the articles.
Quality Appraisal
Quality appraisals of the studies included in
the review were conducted based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool (Guyatt et al.,
2011). The first author (HW) conducted the initial appraisal based on the studies’ methodologies,
consistencies, effect sizes, directness, and quality,
which was independently double-checked by the
second author (PF) for accuracy. Based on the
GRADE tool, an overall grade was given to each
study in a format of very low, low, moderate, and
high (Balshem et al., 2011; BMJ Clinical Evidence,
2018; GRADE Working Group, 2004). The grades
of quality appraisal were indicated in abstraction
Tables 1, 2, and 3.
Data Extraction and Synthesis
Data were extracted using a tabular table developed by the first author based on the purpose of
the study. Data extracted included the purpose of
the study, design, sample, setting, measurements,
interventions, and main findings of the studies.
The first author (HW) conducted the initial extraction, which was independently double checked by
the second author (PF) for accuracy.
Data synthesis was performed by grouping
studies based on the target population. The target population in this review was referred to as
5
Purpose
To examine the
effects of Watson
Caring Theory–
based care on
women’s distress,
perceived
self-efficacy,
adjustment to
infertility
To determine the
effects of a caring
intervention—a
3-minute back
massage at
bedtime on
patients’
perceptions of
nurse caring
To examine the
psycho-spiritual
influences of a
caring theorybased spiritual
intervention on a
cardiac population
ArslanOzkan,
Okumus, and
Buldukoglu
(2014) Turkey
Broscious,
Spigelmyer,
and
Breckenridge
(2015) USA
Delaney and
Barrere (2008)
USA
Quasiexperimental,
pre- and
posttest,
repeatedmeasures: T1 :
baseline; T2 :
right after
intervention;
T3 : 1 month
after
intervention
A quasiexperimental
design
Randomized
controlled
trial
Design
Caring Interventions Toward Patients
Authors/
Year/
Country
TABLE 1.
Pdf_Folio:3
Patients with
cardiovascular
disease Enrolled:
T1 : n = 46
Completed: T3 :
n = 13
Patients on an
inpatient
rehabilitation
nursing unit
Enrolled:
Int: n = 15
Con: n = 14 All
finished the
study
Women seeking
infertility
treatments
Enrolled:
Int: n = 60
Con: n = 60
Completed:
Int: n = 52
Con: n = 53
Participants
The State-Trait Anxiety
Inventory; The
Spirituality Scale
CBI
The Infertility Distress
Scale; The Turkish
fertility Self; Efficacy
Scale-Short Form; The
Turkish Fertility
Adjustment Scale
Measurements
A spirituality-based
intervention: Music
imagery sessions using
a CD, Blessings, to
promote relaxation,
spiritual awareness, and
feelings of appreciation
A 3-minute slow, gentle,
rhythmic back massage
with a uniform speed
and light pressure at a
rate of 60 strokes per
minute with a 2-in.
wide area
A Watson Caring
Theory caring-based
program: Four 45–90
minutes transpersonal
meetings/interviews
when participating
women came for
infertility treatments
Interventions
Grade Level of Evidence: Low
(Continued)
• No significant differences in anxiety or
spirituality at 1 month
T2 to T3 :
• Positive relationships between
spirituality-based music/imagery
intervention and patients’ psychological
and spiritual outcomes
Grade Level of Evidence: Very low
T1 to T2 :
• Both groups had similar responses. Three
themes emerged: offering hygienic
and comfort care; showing caring behaviors; and helping patients be relaxed and
comforted
Qualitatively:
• No statistically significant differences in
patients’ perceptions of nurse
caring between intervention and control
groups
Grade Level of Evidence: High
Quantitatively:
• No significant improvements in
distress, self-efficacy scores, or adjustment to infertility
Participants in the control (Con) group:
• Significant improvements in distress
(p < .001); self-efficacy scores (p < .001);
and adjustment to infertility (p < .001)
Participants in the intervention (Int) group:
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
Purpose
To evaluate the
effectiveness of a
theory-based
program on
women’s anxiety
and distress due
to failing fertility
treatments
To promote
meaningful
therapeutic
relationships
between hospital
staff and patients
Durgun
Ozan and
Okumus
(2017)
Turkey
Pipe,
Mishark,
Hansen,
Hentz, and
Hartsell
(2010) USA
A pilot feasibility study
with pre- and
postintervention measures
Randomized
controlled
trial
Design
Patients on a
general medical
unit of an
academic
hospital
Enrolled:
n = 19
Completed:
n = 15
Women in
infertility
treatmentEnrolled:Int: n = 45
Con: n = 41
Completed:
Int: n = 32
Con: n = 35
Participants
Caring Interventions Toward Patients (Continued)
Authors/
Year/
Country
TABLE 1.
Pdf_Folio:4
Linear Analog
Self-Assessment
Instrument; Medical
Outcomes Study Social
Support Survey; Herth
Hope Index; Spiritual
Well-Being Scale
Spielberger’s State-Trait
Anxiety Inventory;
Distress Scale; Ways of
Coping Questionnaire
Measurements
Watson Caring Theory–
based program about
Lifestory telling: Using
a Tree of Life poster to
portray sources of
encouragement and
enjoyment for patients
including their
memories, life events,
family, and roots
Watson Caring Theory–
based nursing care
program: Six sessions
during the infertility
treatment process at T1
—Pretreatment; T2—
after Embryo Transfer;
and T3—8th week
follow up
Interventions
Grade Level of Evidence: Low
• Improved significantly
(p = .02)
Spiritual well-being:
(Continued)
• Did not change significantly from admission to discharge
Social support and hope index:
• Significant improvements at discharge:
overall QOL (p = .05), emotional
well-being (p = .005), physical well-being
(p = .02)
Grade Level of Evidence: High
The QOL:
• Statistically significant differences
between the groups on participants’
mean scores of anxiety, distress,
ways of coping with stress, self-confident
approach, optimistic approach,
social support seeking approach, unconfident approach, or submissive approach
(p < .001)
After intervention at T2 and T3:
• No statistically significant differences
between intervention and control
groups on participants’ mean scores of
anxiety, distress, ways of coping with
stress self-confident approach,
optimistic approach, social support seeking approach, unconfident approach, or
submissive approach
Before intervention at T1:
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
To evaluate the
effectiveness of a
holistic
perioperative
program on
helping patients’
pain and anxiety
To determine the
effects of a caring
theory–based care
on anxiety,
depression,
hopelessness, and
prenatal
attachment of
women after a
pregnancy loss
Sears, Bolton,
and Bell
(2013) USA
Tektaş and
Çam (2017)
Turkey
A
longitudinal
study design:
T1 : before
therapy
T2 : after
therapy T3 :
postsurgery
A
randomized
controlled
trial
Design
Spielberger’s State-Trait
Anxiety Inventory; An
author-constructed
six-item scale to
evaluate the program
The Beck Anxiety Scale;
The Beck Depression
Scale; The Beck
Hopelessness Scale; The
Prenatal Attachment
Inventory
Women who
experienced a
pregnancy loss:
Enrolled:
Int: n = 68
Con: n = 60
Completed:
Int: n = 55
Con: n = 46
Measurements
Patients coming
to the hospital
for surgery
T1 /T2 : n = 111
T3 : n = 72
Participants
Watson Caring Theory–
based nursing care
program: Five 30minute semistructured
consultations during
participants’ 10th/12th,
16th, 20th, 24th, and
28th weeks of
pregnancy
A holistic healing
program based on
Watson’s Theory of
Caring: A 1-hour
healing therapy in the
perioperative suite of
the hospital
Interventions
Grade Level of Evidence: High
• Statistically significant differences
between the groups on
participants’ mean scores of anxiety,
depression, hopelessness, and prenatal
attachment (p < .001)
After intervention:
• No statistically significant differences
between intervention and control
groups on mean scores of anxiety,
depression, hopelessness, and prenatal
attachment
Before intervention:
Comparing anxiety at T1 and T3 : Significant
reduction on the anxiety and physical
pain (p = .001, respectively) Grade Level of
Evidence: Moderate
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
Notes. CBI = caring behaviors inventory; QOL = quality of life.
aGrade Level of Evidence was based on studies’ following criteria: (a) methodology, (b) consistency, (c) directness, (d) effect size, and (e) quality, which was ranked from very low to high
quality of evidence (Balshem et al., 2011; BMJ Clinical Evidence, 2018; GRADE Working Group, 2004; Guyatt et al., 2011).
Purpose
Caring Interventions Toward Patients (Continued)
Authors/
Year/
Country
TABLE 1.
Pdf_Folio:8
One group, preand posttest
design with
repeated measures
T0 : before
intervention
T1 : right after
intervention T2
and T3 : 3 and 6
months after
intervention
respectively
To study the
feasibility,
acceptability, and
effects of
a caring theory–based
nursing educational
program on a
hemodialysis unit in
Switzerland
To compare
perceptions of care
before and after an
educational session
integrating Watson’s
Caring Theory
Delmas, O’Reilly,
Iglesias, and
Burnier (2016)
Switzerland
Desmond, Horn,
Keith, Kelby,
Ryan, and Smith
(2014) USA
A quasiexperimental preand posttest
design
Not specified in
the article Authors
evaluated the
results of nurse
caring efficacies
pre and post a
theory-based
education
program
Design
Caruso, Cisar, and To describe the
Pipe (2008) USA
outcomes of a caring
theory-based
educational approach
in a hospital and
outpatient clinic
Purpose
Staff nurses from
10 units of a
community
hospital
n = 10
Nurses and
patients on
a hemodialysis
unit Enrolled:
Nurses:
n = 9 Patients:
n = 22 Completed:
Nurses:
n = 9 Patients:
n = 16
A health system:
Number of
participants not
provided
Subjects
Caring Interventions Toward Nurses and Allied Caregivers
Authors/
Year/ Country
TABLE 2.
Pdf_Folio:9
The Caring
Nurse-Patient
Interaction Scale
Nurse Version;
HCAHPS scores
The French
version of the
Treatment
Acceptability and
Preference
Questionnaire;
The French
version of the
Caring
Nurse-PatientInter
action Scale
A questionnaire
developed based
on the Theory of
Human Caring to
assess nurses’
caring efficacy.
Baseline: pre
educational series
Post: after the
education series
and 2 months later
Measurements
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
(Continued)
A one-day caring Nurses:
theory educational
• Nurse’s confidence in caring
seminar held
attitudes and behaviors had statistically
offsite in a home
significant increases immediately as well
setting
as 6-months post the intervention
education.
Grade Level of Evidence: Moderate
• Nurses demonstrated significantly higher
humanism and were more sensitive
to patients’ physical and spiritual needs
Patients:
An educational
Nurses:
program guided
• The theoretical education program was
by Watson’s
offered at a great time of need
Caring Theory:
•
The intervention was extremely acceptable
Four sessions over
and appropriate
a period of 3
• The program contributed to humanistic
weeks, lasting 3.5
nursing practice
hours per session
Grade Level of Evidence: Very low
A Watson Caring Authors stated that the increase of nurses’
Theory–based
caring efficacy was modest at the time of intereducation
vention completion and 2-month follow-up
program: A
• No specific details of the increases were
four-part
provided
education series in
•
The evaluation of the continuing
a seminar format
education program and attendance of the
program were “good” according to the
authors
Interventions
TABLE 2.
Purpose
To improve nurses’
satisfaction and
retention by crafting a
caring work
environment
Drenkard (2008)
USA
A quasiexperimental,
between subjects,
naturalistic,
longitudinal study
Design
One healthcare
system Int. units:
four medical units
Con. units: four
surgical units
Patients on pilot
units: n = 134 pre
and n = 155 post
Comparison units:
n = 141 pre and
127 post
Employee survey
2004: n = 277
2006: n = 131
responded to both
pre and
postsurveys
Subjects
Caring Interventions Toward Nurses and Allied Caregivers (Continued)
Authors/
Year/ Country
Pdf_Folio:10
Nursing processes
of medication
administration;
admission,
discharge, and
transfer;
documentation
process, and
communication;
The Caring
Assessment Tool
Version II; The
Caring Factor
Survey; The
Healthcare
Environment
Survey; Employee
opinion survey;
The NDNQI RN
satisfaction survey
Measurements
Grade Level of Evidence: Moderate
• Scores were increased on nurses’ treating
patients with courtesy and respect, and
listening carefully to patients
Hospital HCAHPS scores:
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
Grade Level of Evidence: Moderate
(Continued)
• The caring interventions also improved
nurses’ retention rates
• No significant differences in patients’ perceptions of caring pre- or postinterventions
• Nurse satisfaction scores improved significantly, especially on workload and
relationships with coworkers
• Patient satisfaction ranked excellent
on the pilot units—from 9.9%–79.2%
(pre) to 57.6%-98.7% (postinterventions)
Phase I: a process Phase I: Time savings:
improvement
• Patients’ admission, discharge, and transphase Phase II:
fer times decreased
Four pilot units to
• Average time to admit a patient decreased
improve: (a)
from 75.93 minutes to 56.13 minutes,
medication
an 18.2-minute reduction for admission
administration; (b)
•
Nurses’ perceptions of time to
admission,
attend patients’ emotional and psychosodischarge, and
cial needs improved by 16.2%
transfer; (c)
•
Nurses’ perception of sufficient time for
documentation;
direct patient care improved by 13.1%
and (d)
communication
Phase II:
Interventions
Not clearly
specified
Nelms, Jones, and To examine the
Treiber (2011) USA effectiveness of a
Watson Caring
Theory–based
program to decrease
medication
administration errors
Norman, Rossillo, To describe the effects Not specified in
and Skelton (2016) of a healing
the article
USA
environment based on
Watson’s Caring
Theory
Not specified in
the article Patients
were randomly
selected into two
intervention and
control groups
Design
Dudkiewicz (2014) To determine the
USA
effects of a caring
theory–based care
approach on patient
satisfaction
Purpose
The CBA tool;
Patients were
asked to rate their
satisfaction with
the hospital stay
from 1 (not
satisfied) to 5
(very satisfied)
Measurements
Hospital staff
members
HCAHPS scores;
Employee
engagement
survey scores
A medical unit No Comparing the
specific number of number of
participants given medication
administration
errors during and
before the
intervention
Patients pending
discharge hospital
Group 1 (before
Int.): n = 20;
Group 2 (1 month
after intervention):
n = 20
Subjects
Caring Interventions Toward Nurses and Allied Caregivers (Continued)
Authors/
Year/ Country
TABLE 2.
Pdf_Folio:11
Using experiential
teaching and
learning to explore
the nursing theory
A Watson Caring
Theory–based
intervention:
Nurses wore
brightly colored
sashes during the
time of
administering
medication
Eleven 40–
45-minute
educational inservice training to
inpatient nursing
staff and four
other departments
—phlebotomy,
dietary,
environmental,
and patient
secretarial staff
Interventions
Grade Level of Evidence: Low
(Continued)
• Positive improvements in HCAHPS and
employee engagement scores
Grade Level of Evidence: Low
• Still worried about other care obligations
• Did not feel a difference in medication
error-reporting
Nurses reported:
• Did not decrease medication administration errors
Medication errors:
Grade Level of Evidence: Low
• Helping/trust and human needs assistance (p = .009 and p = .024, respectively)
Two CBA subscales statistically significant
improved:
• Improved; but not statistically significant
(p = .52)
Patients’ perceptions of nurse caring behavior:
• Statistically significant improvement 1
month after intervention (p = .013)
Patients’ satisfaction with their hospital stay:
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
To test the
effectiveness of the
Watson Caring
Theory–based new
nurse orientation
program
Phillips and Hall
(2014) USA
Subjects
Comparative
New graduate
descriptive design nurses Int: n = 4
examining
Con: n = 16
differences among
two groups:
nurses in a
traditional
orientation
program and in
the newly revised
program
Design
Interventions
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
Grade Level of Evidence: Low
• No significant changes after the intervention.
The Casey-Fink
Watson Caring
The intervention group:
Graduate Nurse
Theory-based
• Statistically significant improvements
Experience Survey nurse internship
in competence and confidence scores
program: A 12at 6 and 12 months in the following areas:
month orientation
program
a. prioritizing patient care needs
including a
(p ≤ .05)
2-week classroom
b. opportunities to practice skills and
training, a
procedures (p ≤ .05)
specialty class
c. level of comfort communicating
training, a
with patients and their families
competency
(p ≤ .05)
checklist, a
d. feeling excited and challenged by
preceptorship
the career (p ≤ .05)
program, and six
internship forums Retention rates:
Measurements
Note. CBA = caring behavior assessment; HCAHPS = hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and system; NDNQI = National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators.
aGrade Level of Evidence was based on studies’ following criteria: (a) methodology, (b) consistency, (c) directness, (d) effect size, and (e) quality, which was ranked from very low to high
quality of evidence (Balshem et al., 2011; BMJ Clinical Evidence, 2018; GRADE Working Group, 2004; Guyatt et al., 2011).
Purpose
Caring Interventions Toward Nurses and Allied Caregivers (Continued)
Authors/
Year/ Country
TABLE 2.
Pdf_Folio:12
Purpose
Evaluate the
effectiveness
of a ropes
course and
caring group
experiences on
nursing
students
Examine the
effects of a
caring theorybased teaching
intervention
on promoting
students’
caring
behaviors
during the
bloodpressure
taking
Validate a
Watson Caring
Theory–based
simulation
scenario in a
psychiatric
inpatient
setting
Birx, Wagstaff,
and Van Patten
(2008) USA
Minnesota
Baccalaureate
Psychomotor
Skills Faculty
Group (2008)
USA
Hermanns, Lilly,
and Crawley
(2011) USA
Study design was
not specified in
the article
Students were
asked to evaluate
the simulation
afterward
Nonexperimental
descriptive
repeated measures
design
Nonequivalent
control group
pretest–posttest
design
Design
Caring Interventions Toward Nursing Students
Authors/Year/
Country
TABLE 3.
Pdf_Folio:13
A clinical group of
10 students: n = 10
Students who
completed final
evaluation tools:
n=7
Junior-level
baccalaureate
nursing students
in six nursing
programs n = 60
Repeated
measures analysis
based on 59
students (1
missing data)
Nursing students
in a mental health
course n = 68
Divided into eight
groups: four
intervention and
four comparison
groups
Subjects
An evaluation tool
developed for the
study by authors
The Caring Ability
Instrument;
Group Cohesion
Questionnaire; An
open-ended
questionnaire to
gather reflections
after the ropes
course and caring
group experiences
Caring behaviors
during blood
pressure
measurement
Instrument; The
role player survey
of caring
behaviors during
blood pressure
measurement
instrument
Measurements
Based on the Watson Caring
Theory, a simulation
scenario was developed: A
focused 30-minute
psychiatric crisis scenario A
20-minute debriefing
conference was conducted
in the end
Students watched two
different versions of
videotapes: One was
endorsed by the Minnesota
Division of the American
Heart Association. Another
one was made by the
researchers of the study
based on Watson Caring
Theory
Caring group and ropes
course experiences were
integrated into the first
semester of an upperdivision baccalaureate
nursing curriculum
Interventions
(Continued)
“Now I know what to do” and
“looking and seeing differently”
Grade Level of Evidence: Low
• The simulation was well
received by students
• Students indicated two main
themes:
Grade Level of Evidence: Moderate
• Students demonstrated 84%
of the caring items on the
posttest versus 74% of the items
on the pretest
• Within-student pre- and post
test scores on caring behavior
measures demonstrated significant improvements (p < .01)
Grade Level of Evidence: Very low
• No significant differences
between intervention
and comparison groups on caring ability (p > .05) or group
cohesion (p > .05)
• Both groups showed improvements in posttests
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
To study the
acceptability
and efficacy of
a Watson
Caring
Theory–based
education
program for
nursing
students in
Taiwan
Wu, Chin, and
Chen (2009)
Taiwan
A quasiexperimental
nonrandomized
two group preand posttest
design
Design
Full-time second
year RN to BSN
nursing students
in Southern
Taiwan Enrolled:
Int: n = 40
Con: n = 45
Completed:
Int: n = 35
Con: n = 33
Subjects
The CBA;
Qualitative
description to
evaluate the
caring course
Measurements
Intervention:
a 13-week
caring education program
based on Watson’s 10
caritas factors through
multiple teaching strategies
Interventions
Grade Level of Evidence: Moderate
Qualitative results indicated that a
caring education could help nursing
students by building caring behaviors
• Significantly higher scores
of caring behaviors after the
education program (p < .01)
• Significantly higher scores of
each of the CBA subscales
except existential/phenomenological/spiritual forces (p = .13)
• The subscales showing significant improvements:
Humanism/faith-hope/
sensitivity (p = .01); Helping/trust (p < .01); Expression
for positive/negative feelings
(p < .01); Teaching/learning
(p = .02); Support environment
(p < .01); and Human needs
assistance (p = .02)
Students in the intervention group:
Results/Grade Level of Evidencea
Note. CBA = caring behaviors assessment.
aGrade Level of Evidence was based on studies’ following criteria: (a) methodology, (b) consistency, (c) directness, (d) effect size, and (e) quality, which was ranked from very low to high
quality of evidence (Balshem et al., 2011; BMJ Clinical Evidence, 2018; GRADE Working Group, 2004; Guyatt et al., 2011).
Purpose
Caring Interventions Toward Nursing Students (Continued)
Authors/Year/
Country
TABLE 3.
Pdf_Folio:14
ID:p0435
ID:p0460
ID:ti0050
ID:ti0055
ID:p0440
ID:p0450
ID:ti0065
ID:p0465
ID:ti0060
ID:p0455
participants on whom intervention approaches
were applied. Intervention approaches in this
review were planned strategies that were intended
to improve either nurses’ or students’ practice
skills or patients’ difficulties lived such as anxiety,
depression, pain, or hopelessness.
Due to the heterogeneity of intervention
approaches and study designs, data were synthesized narratively. The narrative synthesis
was done according to a constant comparative
method suggested by Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014), based on which interventions and
outcomes were compared across studies. The
resulting synthesis included descriptions of the
interventions, participants, interventions, and
outcomes.
Results
General Characteristics of the Studies Reviewed
The literature search was guided by the PRISMA
(Moher et al., 2009) flow diagram. The initial
search of literature retrieved 143 records. One
hundred and twenty-one articles remained after
duplicates were removed with database reference
management filters. After titles and abstracts were
screened, 38 articles were left for full-text assessment, after which 19 articles were included for
review. The details of the search process are displayed in a PRISMA flow chart (Figure 1).
Studies reviewed were conducted in various
countries, including the United States (14 studies; 73.6